Man Builds 60-foot Tower to Get Highspeed Access 348
Matt Russell writes "A church was blocking the only high speed signal in town, so he decided he needed to go higher. This is the story of one man's quest to build a 60-foot reception tower in his yard and retire his modem once and for all." From the article: "Well, if you want to have a tower, you need to find one. Buying a new tower is not a good idea, since there are plenty of used ones. In my case, I was in need of a tower that was at least 50', which would cost around $1,000 USD for a new one. The way I searched was pretty simple. I spread the word around town that I was looking for one, and I drove around to see if there was a house with an old TV tower or something like that. If a 30' tower would be enough for you, go to a small town and look for TV tower. If you find one that looks to be in good shape, just go knock on the door and ask if you can buy it. At least 90% of people don't use them anymore, so it's a good place to start! "
Re:oh (Score:5, Interesting)
Planning? (Score:4, Interesting)
However, in my country (the UK), you can't just slap up something like that without going through an extremely tedious planning consultation with the local authority - usually your city or district council. This is both expensive (all has to be nice and legal etc) and time consuming. If you put it up without planning, you can apply for retrospective planning permission, but if it's refused then you have to tear it down (or the men in suits come do it for you). Quite a deterrant to similar DIY projects.
What sort of approval (if any) is needed for this sort of thing stateside?
Two Points (Score:3, Interesting)
2. To those asking if this is Wi-Fi, it could be what I have. I'm not sure what it is, but it operates on the 900MHz band (I know, my cordless phone destroys the internet). I have a UHF Yagi in the attic pointed at a tower at the elementary school 3 miles away. The signal barely makes it over a hill in front of my house to get it. But I'm not complaining, I get 1Mbps both ways (128kb uploads, 128kb downloads) with it and it's neither a telco nor a cable co.
Lightning protection (Score:5, Interesting)
And I wasn't too thrilled with his weld quality either. Looks like it was showing rust in the picture. And the bottom plate looked like it would hold water, not shed it. Overall, I'm not sure I'd want it next to my home.
So what.. I built a solar powered repeater... (Score:3, Interesting)
http://cowmix.com/solar6/compressed/ [cowmix.com]
Picture of the tower? (Score:2, Interesting)
I want my $0 back.
This reminds me of the time... (Score:2, Interesting)
I did this as well (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Rohn 25 (Score:5, Interesting)
Also, since he mentioned paying Canadian dollars for it, ice loading will limit the self-supporting height [radiancorp.com]. With 1/2" ice load the best you can do is 20 feet, in a low wind area and a small antenna. Even in a mild climate, the safe limit for self-supported 25G is 40 feet.
Do what the manufacturer says. They know where the failure point is. Overloaded towers will fail, it's a matter of when--not if.
Re:used tower == death wish (Score:5, Interesting)
But, did you read the article? The fsckin' tower itself is the safest bit of the whole project! It might be 30+ years old, exposed to the canadian weather, and been knocked around by trucks in the back yard of his father's workplace, but I'd trust it a damn sight more than I would his built-over-several-weeks-out-of-waste-concrete base, his made-from-old-leftover-gal-plate baseplate home welded to the base of the tower, or the 3 bolts and 6 nuts which hold it in midair (look carefully - the baseplate doesn't touch the concrete slab).
Not to mention that the hole filled with water in 12 hours - he's got a serious problem with his soil stability right there.
Personally, I'll wait for the story telling how the bolts broke, the welds cracked, the baseplate tore, the slab delaminated, or the whole thing floated out of the ground and fell over...
Re:What is exactly so dangerous? (Score:2, Interesting)
But I will admit, you do need a quality tower if you are going over 100 feet. a wide base is very important. Alot of the older commercial towers were the same size from top to bottom, especially the ones over 500 feet tall. and they relied on guy wires for most of their support. Imagine climbing up a 500 foot tower? I don't think I would want to go that high, 100 foot is scary enough.
Anyone remember this story about one of the tallest structures in the united states falling down and killing two? http://www.eham.net/articles/4033 [eham.net]
Of course, it was a 1,965 Foot Tower in Nebraska.
Photos of another tower install, but taller (Score:3, Interesting)