Daily Grind Webcomic Challenge 264
Dauntilus writes "Bent Comics is sponsering a web-comic contest. Contestants put $20 into the pool, and they must update their comics 5 times a week. If they fail to update on time, they are out. Last artist in gets the pool. The contest started yesterday with a sweet $1,120 in the pot. A few big webcomic artists like Scott Kurtz (PVP) and Chris Crosby (Superosity) have even show up for the fun."
ctrl alt del! (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:ctrl alt del! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:ctrl alt del! (Score:5, Insightful)
Forcing them to update constantly would likely kill the comics we know and love until the contest is over.
Quantity over Quality (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:ctrl alt del! (Score:5, Insightful)
Nice way to borrow money (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:What about quality ? (Score:2, Insightful)
Stencils
Art is not hard to crank out fast. Ideas are. I'm far more impressed with Dilbert than Get Fuzzy.
Re:ctrl alt del! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:What about quality ? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:ctrl alt del! (Score:3, Insightful)
It'll never end. (Score:2, Insightful)
Kurtz boasts going years without missing an update (what about those sickdays and guest weeks?), I'm sure he can easily keep updating for years without fail if he makes the effort. The same goes for Chris Crosby of Superosity. For them it's not an incentive to update, they're in it for the money!
No one's going to win this now, it's never gonna end.
Re:Quantity over Quality (Score:1, Insightful)
With Scott Kurtz and others in the mix who haven't missed a daily strip in years, you would have to ask yourself: is it worth the time and trouble to draw a crappy, non-funny web comic five days a week for years and years, where the only motivation is to win a few hundred dollars? I can think of easier ways to make money.
Cheap labour (Score:2, Insightful)
Yet another cheeky attempt at getting cheap labour. They get a site with daily updates down for free.
It reminds me of some design jobs that had a task for possible applicants. When you applied for the job, you where given a brief from one of their customers. Whoever did the best design, got the job...meanwhile the company got paid a few thousand for the guys work before he even started.
Re:What about Dilbert? (Score:1, Insightful)
The Dilbert web site runs strips well after they've been published in the paper, which would disqualify the site immediately.
Re:No PA :-( (Score:3, Insightful)
I raise you one Pokey (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Quantity over Quality (Score:4, Insightful)
I still read UF every day, just out of habit, I havne't laughed at it in about a year. The only good storyline he's had in ages was the "The Thing" parody in Anarctica, but other than that, Illiad's just phoning it in.
As for Dilbert, it was cutting edge 10 years ago, but Adams has let it stagnate, its still the same tired joke told by the same nonentity archetype characters. To put it bluntly, its the new Garfield. its good for a chuckle, but its not engaging like PvP or Sluggy Freelance.
Anyone intrested in a 20 year, no-intrest loan? (Score:4, Insightful)
Now, it might be intresting they put the money into a mutual fund or something, so that if the contest did take years, the reward would be worth it
Re:ctrl alt del! (Score:1, Insightful)
And by "own" you mean still have the most un-funniest and shittiest web comic at 5 time a week instead of 3, then yes you are correct.
Heck, I will give you the plot/joke line for that whole week.
Panel 1:
Tyco: This fucking game/company/thing/etc sucks fucking ass!
Gabe: Fuck balls shit piss penis cocks.
Panel 2:
Tyco: But only fucking people who are fucking gay and are stupid fucking retards would like game/company/thing/etc
Gabe: I fucking kind of fucking like game/company/thing/etc ass wang fucking shit!
Panel 3:
Tyco: UR t3h fucking ghay fucking faggot!1111oneonetwo! ROFLTLSLSLolol1
Re:ctrl alt del! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:And the winner is... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Buffer cache (Score:2, Insightful)
Megatokyo is often criticized as being one of the most popular inconsistent comics, yet the author is on record as having a point in time where even he had a buffer (after some comic challenge thing, similar to the OP). He said he was set for about 2 weeks. Of course, he worked through that and got back on the missed updates. Lately, though, he's been on-time.
For anyone based on internet publication, I think timeliness is one of the most overlooked aspects of the process, and people often approach it in the same procrastinatey way they do term papers and homework. Unsurprisingly, the students that often perform well in school are the ones who have their homework done well before the deadline, giving them a buffer for editing and more
One of the reasons I personally like Penny Arcade is because there's always a new comic on MWF. And that's one of the reasons I completely lost interest in The Brunching Shuttlecocks when they were still updating -- they were on long hiatuses (hiatii?) for their last 2 years, so after a while it was easy to forget about them. At which point there's little reason for reading them religiously, and content gets missed.
I'm sure the comics that got involved in the OP are already quite timely -- otherwise they wouldn't get involved. I read it more as a test of how long a comic can stick around and consistently update, rather than how quickly other comics fall behind. I also see it as a statement that people view timelyness as an important and valuable aspect of web publications.