.org Registry Offline - Not 224
einer writes "According to the The Register, the registry containing all of the .org tld information has fallen off the planet. The article is light on details, and doesn't list any potential consequences. " It looks like it's the server that maintains the records for who owns what .org domain - and a big "I Told You So" for Verisign. And of course, now it seems to be working just fine. Good work, PIR.
Huh?? (Score:3, Insightful)
Flame if you will. (Score:5, Insightful)
The worst part is, with the way the resgistrars are distributed now, the blame game is going to be rediculous with everyone pointing at the other guy. In the past there was no question as to who was responsible for any issues.
Is there a better way? (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't think the founding fathers of the Internet thought it of it being like this.
No Surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:hard code this into your hosts file (Score:3, Insightful)
As it happens, you shouldn't be doing this at all. It's unecessary traffic. Your DNS server should always be close. In fact some authoritative name servers don't even do recursive lookups to prevent the sort of (ab)use that you suggested.
But it's moot really. This doesn't affect DNS.
People: If this is an issue at all (I see nothing wrong anywhere [maybe PIR got them back up?] and I don't exactly trust The Register's clue level anyway) then the only issue is WHOIS related. There's no problem with any root servers, thus this isn't a DNS problem.
I'm skeptical of the news. (Score:5, Insightful)
I wouldn't go villifying anyone just yet.
-transiit
Re:whois still working (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Flame if you will. (Score:2, Insightful)
Gotta love the current screwed up state of whois data for
BOGUS REPORT (Score:5, Insightful)
You can't "whois" a
The important function of a registrar is to feed names into the root nameservers. I don't see any indication of any flaws in that process. All the
Anyone?
Retraction is in order (Score:5, Insightful)
Unless, of course, the Reg doesn't take responsibility for what it publishes. Like a lot of so called "news" sites out there. Heck, even slashdot posts retractions once in a blue moon or two.
Pushing the legal envelope? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:PostgreSQL (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, that code in MySQL that makes sure users use updated whois clients is really cool. PostgreSQL might get a similar feature soon, but by then MySQL will have an even better feature that prevents The Register from publishing bogus articles about servers being down when they're up. MySQL rocks! Go MySQL!
It's premature to speculate on the cause of the outage
On a more serious note, it's premature to even say there was an outage.
disappearing stories about disappearing tlds (Score:2, Insightful)
This would be the same site whose journalists often raise an almighty fuss when other publications do exactly the same thing.
I guess they're not double standards when they're your double standards.