I do not have a problem with checking the Medicaid rolls for people who should not be receiving benefits and deporting them if the reason is that they are here illegally. I think that's a great idea that should have been what we were doing from the start.

People won't work long hours under socialism, but people will work whatever jobs they are assigned under socialism? You're going to have to pick one if you don't want people to know that you aren't actually thinking.

Maybe they have to buy hearing aids for their, much now older, customers who can't hear them now? :-)

"Trump's vision of making America the crypto capital of the world"
Well, we first have to beat Nigeria and maybe Cambodia for that title. If the US dollar falls flat on George Washington's face, this vision will be made real.

That makes less than no sense. This is not unusual for you but I still have to wonder where you get your drugs, and how I make sure to avoid that source as what you're getting is clearly tainted.

Why don't they put a checkbox on the tax form, "Yes I want to be thrown into a furnace to power AI"?

I gave my parents a Chromebook. It works fine because all they need is a browser.

Orderlies are on the 'least affected' list.

For or against? Because poor(er) people probably don't make (or fake) enough to warrant an audit. On the other hand, very rich people do, and are apparently very good at paying their accountants/lawyers to game the tax system in their favor. Rich people *definitely* don't want to get audited, but are the ones who should be and the return on the IRS time/effort would probably be worth it.

IRS tops $1 billion in past-due taxes collected from millionaires

Turns out IRS audits of wealthy offer terrific return on investment for taxpayers

Yes, we know that it is possible to devise physics experiments to test quantum mechanics.

If this is the nature of your objection, yes, I agree: it is possible to devise physics experiments to test quantum mechanics.

Huh? The topic of this is about Gilmour Space Technologies's rocket, not SpaceX. Experimental rockets going boom is standard. In the particular case of SpaceX, multiple Starship launches resulted in debris outside the declared range. That was in fact bad, and for good reason resulted in FAA investigations and pauses on their launches. I'm not sure why you think this is a relevant topic when the entire discussion was about a separate Australian rocket. It seems like you are being a little bit obsessive about SpaceX.

Your claim that the bottom of the economic ladder uniformly supports Stumpy is false.

Your assumption that because I'm well-off I'm clueless about the lives and opinions of less well off people is stupid and false.

You're incredibly presumptuous and appear willing to just bullshit without regards to facts. So I'm done wasting time on you.

Why can't they fully legalize suicide? Why such blatant hypocrisy? Just because they can?

I'm loving the hubris that must go into making such a list

Given that the Pentagon can't pass an audit, how much of a rounding error is $114 million?