I guess Dunning-Kruger is with you, as you obviously do not know what it means.
Dunning-Kruger is about beginners over estimating their abilities, as they do not know what they don't know.
And experts tend to underestimate their abilities, as they have an idea how !such knowledge about the topic is out there, which they not know.
One-child policy, or if that sounds too "communist", remove welfare benefits and other incentives for having children. (I would rather see free daycare for the kids that do pop out, but no cash or tax incentives for popping.)
Exactly, this is just typical classist and corporate propaganda from the BBC. Big Media is always sending the same messages.
Manufacturing and disposal emissions are a tiny portion of overall vehicle emissions.
Citation required for a full cycle (that is includes accounting for non-recyclable materials like plastics) emissions.
Why do you think that this is not "real" capitalism?
Capitalism is a system in which capital (the physical means of production) is privately owned. It is still capitalism regardless of how many people or how few people own the capital, and when the word was coined in the 1870s, it specifically referred to "concentration of capital in the hands of a few".
I disagree with your definition, let's use the accepted definition as, "Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their use for the purpose of obtaining profit."
The problem is most people are unable to participate because they are not able to accumulate capital due to the unethical nature of the current economy. The problem is in the unethical part and in the part where people cannot accumulate capital in the first place. An unfair system is unjust by definition. Without access to capital, people cannot capitalize, thus there is no capitalism for the majority of people, thus thus this is not capitalism but it is economic slavery. Just look around, see all the poverty, that's a sure sign of slavery, not capitalism,
Most people are severely under-capitalized. As in poor. Think wage slaves. That's us.
True, perhaps, but not relevant to the definition of capitalism. That statement is pretty much the tl;dr summary of the 19th century criticisms of capitalism. (Unfortunately those 19th century critics didn't succeed in coming up with workable alternatives.)
Broken systems are dysfunctional, if this ever was capitalism, it's broken. Obviously.
That just means that most of the writing you do is useless or of negative worth.
sigh
when capital is used by those who need it in order to get by, that capital needs to be earned and spent, thus capitalism needs to be both fair and equitable in order to function properly
communism is just community, people co-operating together, which is normal
we actually have both operating in conjunction all the time
people are so bent on terminology that they simply don't see our real problems for what they are, greed and hoarding
"People should have access to the data which you have about them. There should be a process for them to challenge any inaccuracies." -- Arthur Miller
