I think that estimate is quite unrealistic. Remember that a line of code can be quite long and contain multiple expressions and whatnot, so I'd say AI could hit at least two showstopper bugs per line of code. Not even DOGE's child geniuses can match that.

Theres stuff that does that here on earth.

Actually Nope...

Actually, yes. You misread (or didn't read at all) that case. When a person accepts a pardon, they are indeed confessing guilt. From Lorance:

"(The) general rule (is) that a pardon implies guilt and acceptance a confession thereof."

Lorance is really about whether you can maintain a habeas petition after pardon, not the meaning of a pardon itself.

They are building a surprisingly deep application platform including client and server hardware

this will be the most epic fail ever... mark my words

There is a reason why systems in cobol exist.

What is even the benefit, the added value of having it run in Java?

Anyway, emigration is always an option. Let the empire break down and then seek opportunities later in what is left.

And I assume you are just trying sarcasm...

As change of law now will still require your code to apply past laws to historical events.

For us the biggest problem was that different rules applied in different time of history. And border cases where not always clear.

Effect:

Feature estimated to take 3 months and 80-100 test cases ended up taking 15 months and over 460 test cases....