Journal BlackBolt's Journal: Rabid Pro-Apple Moderation 8
Reading this story, I noticed the massive flood of pro-Apple sentiment. For an article where the AMD64-bit chips competed against the IBM G5 chips, and supposedly won, I noticed a strange phenomenon. NOBODY WANTS TO BELIEVE IT. Many of the arguments are sour grapes, whining, not logical, or just stupid, but they get modded up anyway, because we WANT them to be right. Why is that? Part of my job is to see things for what they really are; if my vision is clouded by zealotry I lose money. It's obvious that much of Slashdot aren't looking for the truth, they're only out to defend their team without regard for the facts.
Out of 875 posts, only 39 Posts were moderated to 3 or higher:
19 were very pro-Apple or anti-AMD
02 were neutral in tone but were ontopic
06 defended the AMD and the test results
12 were offtopic or funny
Out of 875 posts, there were only 6 defending the AMD position that were worth a 3 or higher. Doubtful.
*Almost everything* that was modded up supported Apple.
I like Apple as much as is humanly possible, but I haven't lost sight of the fact that
Apple is an EVIL MULTINATIONAL who have screwed LOTS of people over (users, developers, third-party vendors, supplier channel, etc.) I've got the links saved, and there are HUNDREDS of outrages they've committed which we've all forgotten. MS commits just as many, but we hold a grudge against them for eternity (that includes me, btw).
Despite their coolness, I don't think the G5's ARE as fast as the AMDs. From what I've seen, the Apples are still short of what they could be. I remember Apple putting faster RAM in their PowerBooks with bus speeds that can't support it. Then they speed up the bus but ditch cache. Then they fix the cache somewhat but ship with 4200RPM harddrives. Apple always wants to give you *just* the amount of computer they can get away with selling you, and nothing more. As you're handing over the cash for your TiBook, they're already planning for your upgrade to an AluBook. That's good business, but it doesn't make for any speed records.
Apple ARE great innovators. They succeed by forcing new standards on their users, and once they've created demand, the more staid PC world hops on board without taking any risk.
Apple ARE more concerned with image than reality. One of the poor pathetic ACs posted something to this effect, and was moderated down immediately. But he's right. They have an air of professionalism and quality in their literature and materials that is greater even than the quality of their hard-and-software. And they make great quality stuff. I just don't think they are the greatest in EVERY category, which so many are prone to think nowadays.
I still remember when "megahertz didn't matter". Now that it's a selling point for Apple, it sure as hell matters to the Slashbots, who will defend the speed on a G5 that 90% of them have never seen in "real life" to the point of rage.
I still prefer the Mac package to the Wintel offerings, because of the integration. But if you've used an Apple, you know they're not perfect. And even with these 2 Ghz chips from IBM, they're not THAT much ahead of the AMDs of the world, if they're ahead at all.
I just hate zealots. I'm a reformed one myself. I guess I got tired of comparing penis size on Slashdot with the other teenagers and slackers.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Excellent points. (Score:2)
I hope Apple *and* AMD do we
Re: (Score:2)
You hit it on the head (Score:1)
Make a post saying that PCs are better in a specific respect than macs(no matter what it is) and you will get a flood of responses telling you how superior the mac is. These people don't want to believe that a wintel machine is better in any way, shape or form.
Incidently, try saying something positive about the US and you'll get a flood of responses telling you it's not true. If you say something negative about another country, the responses will be telling you how much
Re:You hit it on the head (Score:2)
btw, YOU hit it on the head FIRST!
Re: (Score:2)
Re:You hit it on the head (Score:1)
Re:You hit it on the head (Score:2)
The very first thing I thought of was how that exactly describes posters on Slashdot, as well.