smittyoneeach's Journal: damn_registrars for the Trifecta

It's almost a left-handed form of poetry:

You certainly didn't accuse GWB of being a stand-in for his father, or of his father of being a stand-in for Reagan just because they brought a lot of people with from previous administrations.

Whataboutism

The only reason why your Dear Leader had possibly fewer people in his administration who were from previous administrations of his same party were because he was fond of having ass-kissing yes men underneath him. Had he been smart enough to hire intelligent and qualified people (which of course he is and was himself neither) he would have likely had an administration that looked a lot like that of GWB.

Non-sequitur

Naturally, hiring ass-kissing yes men for an administration is also a common trait of a fascist leader. Fascists like your Dear Leader often lack thick enough skin to handle being told they are wrong in any way, shape, or form.

Ad hominem

---

Stay beautiful, d_r: stay_beautiful.

Stop! You're both right!

[fustakrakich]

It's a floor wax(GOP) and a dessert topping(DNC)!

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

You're quite correct, too: Trump is the Unter-Swamp. It's all COFFEE: Carefully Orchestrated Farce For Electorate Entertainment.

Where are the goal posts now?

[damn_registrars]

That was a great exercise you demonstrated of how much you will move those goal posts to defend Your Team. Things that you would want to impeach a democrat for, you are more than happy to see - and defend - from Your Team.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Dude, you've got the goalpost remote. Smart money knows not to fight the control freak for that.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

That's a strange response when you are so proudly telling us about the things you want to impeach democrats for that are 1,000% A-OK for your own Dear Leader to do. That is a textbook case of goalpost relocation, there.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

the things you want to impeach democrats for

When was that, then? Please be specific both in terms of things and the timestamp.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

the things you want to impeach democrats for

When was that, then? Please be specific both in terms of things and the timestamp.

I lost track of all the things you wanted to impeach President Lawnchair over. For a while you found another one at least every month.

Certainly the first one was the high crime of being from the wrong party.

You also wanted to impeach him for signing his name on the bottom of a bill that was based on the health care law signed by Mitt Romney in Massachusetts, that had been endorsed by the Heritage Foundation right up until the wrong party took up residence in the White House.

You also wanted to im

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

No, I seem to recall personally being exercised about Benghazi, as leaving heroes to die under fire remains beyond the pale.

Otherwise, your noise is Biden-esque fantasizing, like how Bo has died in seemingly every war we've ever engaged in on every front, depending upon whom Zombie Joe mumbles in front of on a certain day.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

No, I seem to recall personally being exercised about Benghazi, as leaving heroes to die under fire remains beyond the pale.

You happily ignore the fact that your Benghazi conspiracy depends on the Lawnchair Administration having intentionally chosen to not travel backwards through time to prevent it from happening. Yes, people died - nobody rejects that fact - but the events unfolded too quickly to prevent that. By the time it was clear that the annex was going to be attacked, it was too late to send anyone.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Subsequent depravity from Your Team shows that it's all been fraud, and I believe nothing that has been reported in public on the topic.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

I believe nothing that has been reported in public on the topic.

Then on what do you base your apparently very strong opinion on the topic? You have information that's not reported in public?

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

For example, the J6 footage that was FINALLY pried loose from the Swampeoisie?

Re:

[fustakrakich]

How do you know it was all released? And besides, what does that have to do with your Benghazi shtick? What do you know that nobody else does?

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Certainly, it hasn't all been released, and you're correct to sound a note of caution there. As far as Benghazi, ask literally any veteran who's made a deployment.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

ask literally any veteran who's made a deployment.

Only if they were there, and can speak freely about it

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

How very, very d_r of you to appoint yourself referee of who is qualified to speak. *golf clap*

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Yes, we all know how you like to project.. You're grasping straws

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

ask literally any veteran who's made a deployment.

Only if they were there, and can speak freely about it

How very, very d_r of you to appoint yourself referee of who is qualified to speak. *golf clap*

Yes, we all know how you like to project.. You're grasping straws

Today in non-sequiturs...

Re:

[fustakrakich]

As you wish... don't look up

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Subsequent depravity from Your Team shows that it's all been fraud, and I believe nothing that has been reported in public on the topic.

So you're basing your entire persecution on your feelings instead? That sounds a lot like the "kangaroo courts" that your Dear Leader wants people to believe him to be held and tried by currently.

You may want to consider that perhaps if no factual evidence supports your conspiracy on the matter, that indeed it may just be conspiratorial. Nobody opposing your conspiracy doubts that people died in the Benghazi attack. Nobody opposing your conspiracy wishes that those deaths could have been prevented.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

For example, the 06Jan footage that was FINALLY pried loose from the Swampeoisie?

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Yet none of the members of Your Team who plead guilty to felony offenses for their roles in the January 6th insurrection saw those to be sufficient to ask for a new trial. Maybe you should consider that indeed some of those folks really did want to interrupt the government proceedings for the interest of making an illegal power grab for your Dear Leader?

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

They were Maoist show trials.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

show trials

That's quite the accusation there. Why would these people be willing to sacrifice such a huge portion of their lives - during and after prison - if these were just show trials? It would make a lot more sense for them to fight the charges right away. Being as your Dear Leader had promised - and of course as usual not followed through with - aide for these people, they should have had nothing to lose by challenging their charges in court.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

I understand that you haven't paid attention to the rampant, un-American abuses at work. But, to fustakrakitch's point, failure of the voters to rise up is tantamount to approval of Your Team's tyranny.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

That's quite the accusation there. Why would these people be willing to sacrifice such a huge portion of their lives - during and after prison - if these were just show trials? It would make a lot more sense for them to fight the charges right away. Being as your Dear Leader had promised - and of course as usual not followed through with - aide for these people, they should have had nothing to lose by challenging their charges in court.

I understand that you haven't paid attention to the rampant, un-American abuses at work.

Your allegation is both baseless and non sequitur. I don't expect you have anything at all that can support your allegation of "rampant, un-American abuses", so we might as well just jump to your next conspiracy instead. Do you have reptoids to insert into this at this point? Those of us who watched this unfold saw people pleading guilty to criminal actions. Apparently with your magic MAGA glasses you saw - and heard - something completely different.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

The border, the fentanyl, the J6, the economy...

Re:

[damn_registrars]

That's quite the accusation there. Why would these people be willing to sacrifice such a huge portion of their lives - during and after prison - if these were just show trials? It would make a lot more sense for them to fight the charges right away. Being as your Dear Leader had promised - and of course as usual not followed through with - aide for these people, they should have had nothing to lose by challenging their charges in court.

I understand that you haven't paid attention to the rampant, un-American abuses at work.

Your allegation is both baseless and non sequitur. I don't expect you have anything at all that can support your allegation of "rampant, un-American abuses", so we might as well just jump to your next conspiracy instead. Do you have reptoids to insert into this at this point? Those of us who watched this unfold saw people pleading guilty to criminal actions. Apparently with your magic MAGA glasses you saw - and heard - something completely different.

The border, the fentanyl, the J6, the economy...

Has hasn't changed anything about the border, and no laws have been proposed or offered by congress for it. The situation is neither "un-American" nor an "abuse".

The fentanyl situation has many factors to it. There is no one thing that a POTUS - or any other person - could do to turn it around quickly. Interesting also that since you've taken to defending your new "heroic" murderer cop you are reaching for the disproven claim that his victim died of fentanyl, and now you're turning around to blame fen

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Has hasn't changed anything about the border

Indeed, one of the surprising aspects of Your Team was the discovery that, not only could laws be selectively enforced, but they could be blown off entirely! Hence the spectacle of Mayorkas before Congress doing victory laps over the swell job he's doing, while record numbers of people from Lord knows where are pouring over the border.

The absurdity of all this will only be exceeded by Your Team's industrial-grade Shocked Face when all of the de-railings, power grid drops, and overt terrorist strikes occur

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Thank you for bringing up another conspiracy for us this week - are you tired after launching two of them in one week? That seems exhausting. Notably your promise of great kinds of hellfire in response to the changes that Biden did not make at the border are very different from the window dressing you used to put up claiming a desire to see all people prosper.

nor do I wish ruin on my country

Really? Then why do you endorse fascist leaders? That is undoubtedly ruinous for our country. When democracy falls to fascism - as Your Team is

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Then why do you endorse fascist leaders?

I cannot bring myself to the cruelty of wishing actual fascist leaders upon you. It is an absolute blessing that you have no idea what you're talking about. Let's just keep your antics childish and amusing. Life is better that way.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Then why do you endorse fascist leaders?

I cannot bring myself to the cruelty of wishing actual fascist leaders upon you.

Trump is a fascist.

It was only because there were enough adults in the room during his term that his worst fascist tendencies did not play out.

Now, however, he is a fascist with a cult following. If he wins in 2024 he will surround himself - even more than before - with yes men who will go to great lengths to allow him to do whatever he wants. He also has plenty of supporters in congress who will do everything they can to push his fascist agenda. They will happily hand over increasing amounts of

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Trump is a fascist.

It was only because there were enough adults in the room during his term that his worst fascist tendencies did not play out.

Oh, just piss on your lurid counterfactual. It didn't happen because it wasn't going to happen, because you remain full of fertilizer.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Your Dear Leader has laid out for us his fascist ambitions, in his own words, on public broadcasts and on public tweets. There is no room for error, he wants to install a fascist government.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Your Dear Leader has laid out for us his fascist ambitions

Hasn't ever enumerated a single such. You're engaging in Wanton Acts Of Bidenesque Imagination (WAOBI). Next time, throw in Corn Pop.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Your Dear Leader has laid out for us his fascist ambitions

Hasn't ever enumerated a single such.

Calling your opponents vermin comes straight from the playbooks of Hitler and Moussolini. And just like them he claims to need to get rid of these "vermin", and to be uniquely suited to do so. He also brags about ambitions to weaponize the government against said "vermin".

Your Dear Leader is a fascist, or at the very least has the most blatantly fascist ambitions of any person to ever serve as POTUS.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

So, you're extrapolating from an adjective choice to fascism? That's it? That's what you're going with?

You could have, with an equally straight face, attacked the use of the Roman alphabet and English language, instead of the adjective choice.

póg mo thóin

Re:

[damn_registrars]

His choice was not an accident, nor was it the first time. He has used fascist language repeatedly in his rallies, and has done so more lately than before. You wanted an example, I gave you an example. I don't expect that any particular number of examples will bring you to realize that Your Dear Leader is indeed a fascist, but the rest of the world already recognizes it.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Oh, the Fine People Hoax. You've got nothing, and you're going to get your Thelma & Louise on and drive that nothing off the cliff.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

It goes well beyond just calling his neo-nazi supporters fine people. He's amped up the fascist rhetoric many times since then. His federal agenda bleeds of the same kind of nationalism that is characteristic fascist as well.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

I realize that Your Team's propaganda campaign to make a positive thing like patriotism into a negative thing like fascism is near and dear to your blood pump, but póg mo thóin.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Patriotism and nationalism are not the same. Your Dear Leader shows little of the former and a whole lot of the latter. His rhetoric - and many of his aspirations - are clearly directly from fascism though.

A Patriot should care for all people of his country, whether he or she agrees with them or not. Your Dear Leader is openly demonizing people from our country whom he disagrees with. Your Dear Leader is not patriotic, no matter how hard you spin it.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Patriotism and nationalism are not the same. Your Dear Leader shows little of the former and a whole lot of the latter. His rhetoric - and many of his aspirations - are clearly directly from fascism though.

Oh, just piss all the way off. It is no wonder that Your Team find such strange affinity for Hamas--you're equally fanatic.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Patriotism and nationalism are not the same. Your Dear Leader shows little of the former and a whole lot of the latter. His rhetoric - and many of his aspirations - are clearly directly from fascism though.

Oh, just piss all the way off. It is no wonder that Your Team find such strange affinity for Hamas--you're equally fanatic.

What have you read that I have written that shows an "affinity for Hamas"? As I've said multiple times, blame belongs on both sides of this conflict. Neither side is perfect or blameless, as much as you claim to the contrary.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

affinity for Hamas--you're equally fanatic.

What have you read that I have written that shows an "affinity for Hamas"?

Once more, with feeling: Affinity For Hamas--You're Equally Fanatic.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

affinity for Hamas--you're equally fanatic.

What have you read that I have written that shows an "affinity for Hamas"?

Once more, with feeling: Affinity For Hamas--You're Equally Fanatic.

And once again I ask you, how do you come to that conclusion? What did I write that causes you to believe that, in spite of what I have actually written here?

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

And once again I ask you, how do you come to that conclusion?

The Democrat Party/media/celebrity/Big Tech complex coming out in favor of Hamas was something of an indicator.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

And once again I ask you, how do you come to that conclusion?

The Democrat Party/media/celebrity/Big Tech complex coming out in favor of Hamas was something of an indicator.

You are reading tea leaves that aren't there. Please, please, please, stop assuming that this conflict is a binary one between people who are saints and people who are demons. Both sides have valid gripes against the other. Both sides have lost a lot over the past 70+ years. Both sides have valid requests and both sides want freedom. Similarly both sides are represented by "leaders" with very little public support.

Just because some people recognize humanitarian issues on both sides of this conflic

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

both sides want freedom

That is simply not true of Hamas, if you actually listen to what they're saying to their local audiences.

I certainly want that to be true, but, when Hamas comes out as homicidal fanatics, I suggest that you accept their words at face value and cease with attempting to impose your Western-think upon them.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

both sides want freedom

That is simply not true of Hamas, if you actually listen to what they're saying to their local audiences.

Again, Hamas is not Gaza and Gaza is not Hamas. The Palestinians are the people who are - against their will - represented by Hamas as this time. You openly disagree with President Biden, and would not tolerate people saying that your philosophy is interchangeable with his. Yet you are insisting that the people of Palestine are interchangeable with Hamas. Why do you get that freedom and the right to deny it to others?

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

The Palestinians are the people who are - against their will - represented by Hamas as this time.

You're speaking with certainty about something that is not in view.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

The Palestinians are the people who are - against their will - represented by Hamas as this time.

You're speaking with certainty about something that is not in view.

While the Palestinians are unable to vote, there is ample public polling data from Gaza that shows that Hamas has very little support from the public.

However as you love to look at such data and use it to support a claim to the contrary it surprises me not at all that you are enthusiastically claiming Hamas and Gaza to be interchangeable in spite of data to the contrary.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Were these famous data so prominent, one might be tempted to think you're proffer a link.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

There are plenty of sources that document this issue. I expect you'll discard this one but our own Department of State has documented it [state.gov]:

President Abbas indefinitely postponed national elections in April 2021, stating the reason was that Israel had not agreed to allow Palestinians in East Jerusalem to participate in voting per Israelâ(TM)s commitment in the Oslo Accords

Essentially the fact that Palestinians in East Jerusalem cannot vote means that no Gaza national election can be considered to be one that reflects the will of the people. Israel has held up its refusal of this vote for 15 years now.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

"Credible reports". Tell me: do you think the Hamas civilian casualty figures for the last two months are "credible reports"?

Re:

[damn_registrars]

do you think the Hamas civilian casualty figures for the last two months are "credible reports"?

Please be more specific on this. Are you referring to the Hamas reports of how many civilians have been killed in Gaza by the Israeli counteroffensive? Or are you referring to something else?

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Yes, yes: feign confusion.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

I very directly asked you for clarification on what you're asking. I don't want to walk in to some sort of silly "gotcha" based on you intentionally choosing ambiguous terminology and phrasing. Please answer the question.