Journal smittyoneeach's Journal: Big, If True, But Thin On Facts 7
Everyone knows the DNC and activist groups will trigger their ballot fraud operations in 2024, the problem for them is they can only lift so much through the fraud itself.
Yes, it is possible for the metropolitan counties of Philadelphia (PA), Wayne (MI), Clark (NV), Fulton (GA), Racine (WI) and Maricopa/Pinal (AZ) to each generate between 300,000 and 500,000 fraudulent ballots. However, when contrast against the anticipated scale of the state loss, that might not be enough.
The democrats need a candidate who can lose at a much smaller statewide margin so that ballot fraud (absentee collection) in the corrupt counties can reach their goals. Biden is not that candidate.
That sets up the dynamic where Biden support within the group who will be responsible for covering his deficits has become tenuous. Remember, Eric Holder and the Chicago network organized the original ballot operation and tested it in California in 2018. The two weeks after election day 2018 showed 21 GOP win seats on the day of election, flip through the use of the post-election ballot counting. That midterm test in CA was then rolled out nationally in 2020.
The counties that must be relied upon to sway the election are nervous about the scale of lift they will be required to provide. Within that tenuous situation, the ever ego-driven Obama network cannot accept that level of risk. Hence, Obama strategically retreats.
At the same time, the DC intelligence apparatus that needs to pretend the election is legit and support the fraud, is applying pressure on Biden to exit.
The message from Main Justice, the DOJ-CRD and the DHS embeds is that too much fraud would be problematic to achieve.
Team Biden is fully aware of this dynamic, they need to close the gap--not defeat Trump--but close the election gap to a distance that can be successfully closed by the ballot harvesting and manipulation operations. That's the focus and impetus behind all of the Biden campaign operations; close the gap.
That breathless prose is quite the allegation: "The message from Main Justice, the DOJ-CRD and the DHS embeds is that too much fraud would be problematic to achieve." One is genuniely curious what traffic (if any) to which "Sundance" is privy that could be paraphrased to say that.
The thrust of the post, if you read it all, is that the DNC is worried that Trump may overwhelm the various rigging measures that were intended to keep Zombie Joe in office. (Not that I wish ill on the fellow, but I doubt that he lives another 14 months.)
I'm not actually sure any of this matters. Even if the Eminence Orange wins the primary (solid possibility), there are any number of other legal/medical shoes to drop. Stipulate that the Citrus Caesar wins the election and is inagurated again: what is the likelihood that the GOPatsies would lift finger #1 to bolster election integrity and curb mail-in ballots (an idea too stuck in foopid for even the French)? Low, I'd say. The Deep State doesn't give a French frigate's fo'c's'le for election integrity, and the peasantry having a say.
Thin on facts? (Score:3)
I'll close by pointing out it's interesting that you're forecasting President Biden to drop dead in less than 1.5 years' time from today. Being as the hero of your team is clinically obese and already struggling to match the intellect of a gopher, I find it hard to see how you could forecast him to outlast someone who is at least in reasonable physical shape. I wouldn't be surprised to see Saint Donald succumb fatally in a fight with a pretzel.
Re: (Score:2)
at least in reasonable physical shape
No idea to whom you're alluding here. Surely not Zombie Joe?
Fraud? What fraud? (Score:1)
DNC/GOP gets over 98% of the vote. Where's the fraud? Oh... wait... Is it in the primaries that put Trump/Biden on the ballot? Or maybe the registration process that keeps eligible people from voting? That is certainly fraudulent. but, hey, how else do you maintain those 95% reelection rates and keep the ruling party in power indefinitely? Ya can't do that with free and fair elections, can you?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Well there ya go.. 98% says it's ok. kinda makes fraud like one of those relativism things, doesn't it?
Re: (Score:2)