Journal damn_registrars's Journal: Conspiracy resets to ... conspiracy 29
It seems that some conservatives have finally looked at the calendar and realized that indeed the clock has run out on their previously strongly-held belief that President Barack "Lawnchair" Obama would institute single-payer health care during his administration. Now, some are taking that conspiracy and attaching it to their conspiracy about Hillary Clinton's campaign, claiming that she will implement what President Lawnchair was unwilling and unable to implement. This of course ignores the fact that Hillary has consistently been opposed to single payer, continues to oppose single payer, and is sponsored by Wall Street and the Insurance Industry (who also do better when single payer is repeatedly shot down).
Hillary has... been opposed to single payer (Score:1)
And of course that won't stop you from voting for her, and when she takes office, you will start the complaining, just like with your "lawnchair" schtick. Oops, forgot, you're just trolling Mr. Smith... carry on, soldier!
BTW you're pants are on fire... try sitting on some dry ice for a while...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Not your pants, unless you stand too close to him... And yeah, the JE is kinda dull, but, you know, I just cannot resiiiist! May as well make it into a chat room...
So... why don't you go see the Cubs next year? I would have suggested August 20 to see the air show also, but it's an away game. They're home on the 4th of July though, and the lakefront fireworks are worth seeing, even if they are very brief. One of the things I evangelize is summer in Chicago, the whole summer
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
June 10-12
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
June 10-12 is the blues fest... Don't you google anything?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Hey, do me a favor. You're better with the language, see if you can get d_r to understand the concept of "precedent" and corruption in politics. He seems to believe that his tribe is immune to these sort of things.
Re: (Score:2)
(1) They think lesser beings (e.g. conservatives) are just so much meat.
(2) They reject any sort of absolute truth, irrespective of whether that includes a religious dimension.
(3) They will always argue the present tense, and only admit to a past which positively supports their argument, or attacks their opponent. No 'precedent' matters, especially if already airbrushed via (2).
Re: (Score:1)
You have to understand a few things about the Left:
*sigh* Sorry I asked... Apparently you believe that your tribe is immune. Ah well, I had to give it a try...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Wow, man, that was heavy. I guess reality is just not for you.. I was hoping those brief lucid moments from your other JE would spill over.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
How can I not wave off such absurdities? It is simply total nonsense to make such a claim. And without any kind of evidence to back it up? It was a troll post, pure and simple. Please, do try harder..
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I gave up on waiting for you to explain how you knew ahead of time that President Lawnchair was going to abandon his entire progressive agenda after inauguration.
That's good, now you can stop troubling yourself with things you don't understand and move on. Too bad you don't have a local major league baseball team, you're really missing out, you know...
Re: (Score:2)
I gave up on waiting for you to explain how you knew ahead of time that President Lawnchair was going to abandon his entire progressive agenda after inauguration.
That's good
Presumably because you have no explanation for that. But keep on telling us how awesome your hindsight is, and how the world will bend to your will when you keep touting the values of not voting.
Re: (Score:1)
Whoa! Your pants! Your pants! Your pants are on fire! Careful there buddy, you'll burn down the house.
Re: (Score:2)
The funny thing is, if you want to make an argument for how your system of non-voting is capable of changing the system, you have plenty of experience upon which to build that argument. Instead, after I showed how strong the argument is that you are a non-voter, you are trying to suggest that you c
Re: (Score:1)
You're still lying. I am amused
That is all
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You do not think at all... And you're still lying.
Is the Caps thing supposed to mean something?
Re: (Score:2)
You are pants are on fire?
IMO any of the three Democrats would be a better President than any of the Republicans, although there are two or three Republicans that might not fuck up America too badly.
Perhaps the conspiracy was cooked up by her supporters? The insurance companies are the major reason health care is so expensive and ineffective here.
I'm disgusted by the Republican candidates' cowardice and heartlessness when it comes to refugees, and the fact that none have served in the military but are all
Re: (Score:1)
Typos be typos 'n shit...
Sorry, man, I'm still getting mass media narrative and propaganda. I ask again that you all remember what both factions serve, and that nothing will change while they remain in power. Don't worry about the republican politician, be concerned about who they appeal to. And I've seen enough machine politics to know the democrats are no better, and they're the bigger cowards when it comes to standing up to the republican schtick. The Bush presidency reflects just as badly on cowardly de
Re: (Score:2)
I never vote party, I vote individual candidate, and this time none of the Democrats are anywhere near as bad as the Republican candidates.
Re: (Score:1)
That's Hollywood for ya... They are a tag team.
Re: (Score:2)
You are pants are on fire?
He's just trying to get a rise out of me by throwing around "lying" (and related terms) without any meaning or support. Nothing to see here.
Re: (Score:2)
I've noticed (particularly on facebook) that Republicans have a hard time with "your" and "you're", that was my way of laughing at a seemingly semiliterate fool. Maybe that's why Trump's in the lead?