damn_registrars's Journal: Least Shocking News of the Week

become a Republican after "the Democratic Party left me."

Who said it? None other than the thrice-divorced symbol of traditional marriage inequality Kim Davis, that's who

Same article also mentions:

the Family Research Council honored her with the "Cost of Discipleship Award"

That sounds important, for sure.

Family Research Council

[smittyoneeach]

That would be James Dobson's outfit. JD is the sort who'd endorse Huckabee [bpnews.net]. One of those "Silent Majority" types.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

JD is the sort who'd endorse Huckabee.

And would you?

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

I have previously explained why I decline.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

oh, so sorry I got the wrong JD! The guy I was thinking about was "executive directive of FRC Action", a *cough* non-profit [wikipedia.org] "legislative action arm".. You know these people are common thieves...

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

If you "know" they are "common thieves", yet you do nothing, does that make you an accessory?

Re:

[fustakrakich]

What do you mean "nothing"? Eh, just more derp... and your always on projection

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

I'm saying that if you're sitting on evidence of wrongdoing, you're part of the problem, not the solution.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

The wrongdoing is in allowing them the tax dodge, and making the fraud legal... Interesting to see you always defending these kinds of people.

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

Legal, as in the legality of gay marriage and abortion?

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Whoops! You derped again and exposed more bigotry. You have no standing on those matters. They are personal. And if you want to reduce abortions, invest in education, contraception and get the corruption out of your economy. Leave your cultural chauvinism and superstitions out of it. What you are doing is most contemptible. Learn to butt out. Spend your time on something useful, like looking for a cure for malaria, or caring for its victims if you want to show how 'pro-life' you are. And it wouldn't hurt if

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

You seem to fetish the word "bigotry" like d_r grooves on "conspiracy".
What's fascinating here is that you're asserting the illegality of activities that are rather highly regulated by unfriendly forces. If you think that James Dobson were in any way as far out of line as, say, Josh Duggar, it would not be raining knives wherever James Dobson happens to stand? Duggar points out that we can't put Dobson on any sort of pedestal, certainly. But if you think there was a happy dance over Duggar's idiocy, I've g

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Bigotry is what you post. I hope it is not what you are.* I really do love reading your rationalizations, and here, the oh so selective application of guilt by association, what some might even call an accessory, if we were to be conspiratorially (a truly cromulent word that does apply in the commission of a crime) minded. I save them locally. When I'm in the mood and house bound, I'll compile them into something of your Slashdot biography. Thank you for your input.

* Fetish? I find your proclivity for invok

Re:

[smittyoneeach]

selective application of guilt by association

Could you do me a favor and point this out when it occurs? Because I really strive to avoid this sort of behavior. Bringing it up as a generalization tends to make me think you're as specious as your post-uteral Siamese twin, d_r.