Journal damn_registrars's Journal: President Lawnchair Discovers a Spine? 12
We'll see if this is a lasting new stance or evaporates as usual. My bet is on the latter.
Comparing information and knowledge is like asking whether the fatness of a pig is more or less green than the designated hitter rule." -- David Guaspari
Look, he's been consistent (Score:2)
Totally consistent, achieving the same quality of result across the board and across time.
The #SurpriseNotSurprise will be when Valerie Jarrett decrees that Her Majesty is un-viable as a candidate, and Michelle Obama steps forward to relieve her husband.
Re: (Score:1)
Oh man! Millions of heads popping like balloons! What a sight!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, all your wild ideas are obvious...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
:-) I always speak the truth. Some people just don't like hearing it.
Re: (Score:2)
He has been exactly what everyone who paid any attention expected.
So then you were either expecting him to be more conservative than Reagan, or not paying attention. Which was it?
I will admit that while I was not optimistic enough to expect a great heroic liberal leap forward from his administration, I was not expecting a great conservative fall backwards, either. If he did something during his campaign to clue us in to his intent to turn Reaganomics up to 12 (after seeing his predecessor fail at 11), I missed that.
Re: (Score:2)
So then you were either expecting him to be more conservative than Reagan, or not paying attention. Which was it?
I'll take "Rejecting the Premise" for $50, Alex.
The great conservative revival is to come, and I anticipate you'll be as honest with the flood of prosperity as you've shown yourself elsewhere.
Re: (Score:1)
If he did something during his campaign to clue us in to his intent to turn Reaganomics up to 12 (after seeing his predecessor fail at 11), I missed that.
That's because you didn't pay attention to his record and his sponsors and his associates in the senate. You chose to believe the lies of the party (an excess of faith!), no different than Mr. Smith's Reagan worship. And no doubt you will be out there pimping Hillary in the same fashion, and then complaining when she wins.
The man did exactly as expected, i
Re: (Score:2)
That's because you didn't pay attention to his record and his sponsors and his associates in the senate
So tell me, what did he do - or who did he associate with - that showed he actually wanted to bring about Reaganomics 2.0 instead of Camelot 2.0? And if his record in the senate was so completely counter to his campaign, why did nobody call him out on it while he was on the campaign trail? By comparison, when Joh
Re: (Score:1)
That is the closest you've come in a long, long time (possibly ever) to actually supporting an argument with something vaguely resembling a fact.
Bleh...
Re: (Score:2)
That is the closest you've come in a long, long time (possibly ever) to actually supporting an argument with something vaguely resembling a fact.
Bleh...