damn_registrars's Journal: $freaks++

I put a conservative blowhard in his place when he wrote multiple lying comments in a short time. As facts are clearly too hard for him to comprehend, he added me to his foes list instead. Not much investment in that one. Frankly I'm surprised his foes list isn't longer; I think it is still shorter than the infamous perma-hate list of our dear friend Pudge.

I could fire up the slashdot bastard quotient script for this one, but I'm not that concerned.

Truth is...

[FiftyShadesOfDR]

right here. [slashdot.org]

Still out there selling your ACA BS, eh?

[fustakrakich]

When are you going to start your Hillary campaign? And after voting for her (maybe twice), have you already formulated your smear campaign against her?

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Even for you that comment didn't make much sense. I'd ask you to clarify but if your history is any lesson, there is no purpose in making that request.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

You won't accept that Obama lied about his real intentions on the health bill. If he could run again you would vote for him again.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

You won't accept that Obama lied about his real intentions on the health bill.

What evidence do you have for that? You are claiming to have great hindsight, but what did you know before the writing of the Health Insurance Industry Bailout Act of 2010 that caused you alone to know he wanted this bill that was so utterly opposed to what he campaigned on?

If he could run again you would vote for him again.

Only if the alternative is the election of someone who wants me permanently unemployed.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Using precedence is a very valid method. It was very easy to deduce by his actions on the patriot act and the telecom spying, and his far too close association with the likes of Lieberman. It was obvious from the beginning where his loyalties are. And ' business as usual' shall remain the mainstay. You simply are a gullible follower, just like Mr. Smith. You two are the same, a couple of simple fanatics ready to apply your war paint next year for your respective tribal leaders.

Yes, I did know that he had no

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Using precedence is a very valid method.

Sure it is. Too bad you don't have any.

Yes, I did know that he had no intention of passing anything related to single payer before the election. And quite simply I was right, as I knew I would be. I had the foresight to know this.

It is easy to take hindsight and convince yourself that you had foresight because of it. I have asked you many times how you "knew" that this would happen and every time you have avoided the question. You certainly haven't convinced me that you had any such foresight.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Thank you for confirming you don't read what was posted. Mere tomatoes for you!

Re:

[damn_registrars]

I see as usual you are not going to support your statements with any kind of facts. Keep telling everyone else their wrong, but don't tell them why you are right (at least not for any reason other than because you are you).

Also, your grammar sucks in that accusation.

Re:

[fustakrakich]

Like I said, you didn't read..

...some other time perhaps