Journal smittyoneeach's Journal: Marx sure does spew him some drivel 44
When the ancient world was in its last throes, the ancient religions were overcome by Christianity. When Christian ideas succumbed in the 18th century to rationalist ideas, feudal society fought its death battle with the then revolutionary bourgeoisie. The ideas of religious liberty and freedom of conscience merely gave expression to the sway of free competition within the domain of knowledge.
Yeah, the Hindus and Buddhists are all, "Wut?"
"When Christian ideas succumbed in the 18th century to rationalist ideas" is a hoot because at least a good chunk of the Enlightenment thinkers considered themselves Christian.
"...feudal society fought its death battle with the then revolutionary bourgeoisie." Yeah, there was that extended Bourgeoisgeddon, to roughly the extent the ancient world had "death throes". Charlemagne thought he was just reforming Latin, and would have balked at the idea of these "death throes" that Marx is making up. It sounds as though Marx may have bought off on Edward Gibbon's biases, directly or not.
This is to say nothing of my contempt for Marx's view of private property. What a used car salesman. The Communist vanguard inevitably, invariably, with enough irony to float an Iowa-class battleship, becomes the aristocracy standing in the ashes of the bourgeoisie. The only thing to be done with this foolishness is to reject it, and haul it out with the kids for a cautionary tale about liars.
So, 2% procedural improvement (Score:1)
I think you may be working too hard to try to credit Marx, but will credit your generosity.
It's still just so much class warfare screed, AFAICT. What really matters is that everyone have a fair shot at boosting themselves. Where barriers are erected, THERE is a legitimate place for calls to action.
Re: (Score:1)
Here's the really odd thing I have noticed about Marx and Marxists though. .
See their method, their 'dialectic' boils down to this.
Re: (Score:1)
Marx is a painful read (Score:1)
Marat/Sade can be hard to watch, but the story is largely true. And in both cases, the ending is perfect.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Like many things, you won't understand until you see them through. Maybe you're just too busy...
Re: (Score:1)
Albert Einstein [brainyquote.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Explanations, simple or complex, are useless to those who don't want to hear..
Your post is kinda funny when what I hear from you are accusations of being "simplistic".
Re: (Score:1)
Or do you suppose that self-awareness, too, is mere phantasm, and life truly is turtles all the way down?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
It's not always clear whether people are carrying out rituals for their genuine mystical value, or just doing religious push-ups.
Re: (Score:1)
And whatever the extent of the deeper reasons, it's clear that cruelty to animals is simply something we are advised not to engage in, particularly in the production of our food.
I have no problem with that idea.
Re: (Score:1)
Of course, holding to the notion that Jesus is the Messiah as I do, I don't buy off that the New Testament is anything less than the fulfillment of the Tanakh. That said, no offense is taken, and I'll cheerfully take any educatio
Re: (Score:1)
Highfalutin "beautiful people" living the ghetto culture. You know? Like really, WTF? Turf wars and con games all the way down...
Re: (Score:1)
So far.. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
What do you wan't? The man was, at best, a false prophet. Consider:
s/bourgeoisie/Jews/g
and see where this style of assertion has taken mankind.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Whether he was unhinged or just one of history's most colossal trolls makes little empirical difference, does it?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
"what qualifies you"
Gosh, I don't know, the First Amendment? Common sense? A hearty contempt for "credential-itis"?
Re: (Score:2)
I've read half, and seen the historical effects of these ideas.
Except you haven't. You admitted you have been skimming it, and your "analysis" of it suggests that may be giving you too much credit. If your goal was to understand Communism you are doing yourself no favors.
That said, it does not appear you ever wanted to understand Communism anyways.
How much dirty diaper smell do YOU need for a diagnosis, mister?
I challenged you to think before, and you declined. You seem to be digging in your heels on that decision.
Re: (Score:1)
What part of "it's totally jacked up" do you think I fail to grasp?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
What did you want to gain from it, and why are you not gaining it? The answer to the latter is in your mirror. The answer to the former I'm not sure even you know.
Re: (Score:1)
What did you want to gain from it, and why are you not gaining it?
I wanted some insight into the human condition. What I got was the precursor to BHO's 2012 campaign against Romney.
Re: (Score:2)
What if it is worthy of utter disdain?
How can you conclude that without reading it? Just because you assume (sans fact, as per your most favored m.o.) that communism is TEH EEEEVIL, doesn't mean that the book written by Marx on the matter is actually connected to any of your assumptions on the matter.
What did you want to gain from it, and why are you not gaining it?
I wanted some insight into the human condition
This seems counter to your oft-repeated bits about people "scaling" (or not). Why would you read the writings of one man - who mind you was well past dead long before Lenin lead the Soviets in a strange contortion (and eventual complete discard
Re: (Score:1)
Great work.
Re: (Score:2)
Where would you like to move the goalposts to now? Do you have any recollection to where they were originally before you started moving them?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
So what you seem to say is that falling short of agreeing with Marx == not having read him.
You are utterly wrong on that. You are free to read something and disagree with it. You are even free to disagree with what you don't read. However when you refuse to read something, and then parade about pretending to be an expert on it, it is very likely that you will make yourself look foolish (which you have done repeatedly on this case in particular).
There is nothing at all wrong with disagreeing with Marx. What is absurd is you continuing to claim to be knowledgeable on Communism while refusi
'Expert' (Score:1)
pretending to be an expert on it
You just watch your filthy mouth there, you. ;-)