Slashdot Log In
Sharp's Upcoming Linux PDA
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Sun Oct 07, 2001 04:11 PM
from the it's-not-the-size-that-matters dept.
from the it's-not-the-size-that-matters dept.
Bill Kendrick writes: "ZDNet reports that Sharp is getting ready to make its
Linux-based PDA available to developers in the next few weeks. They'll include a 206MHz StrongARM, 32MB (in the cheaper, developer edition), a JVM, the Opera web browser, and a slide-out keyboard. A profile of the device is available at LinuxDevices.com." We've mentioned this before, but it looks like it'll be here soon.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
pull-out keyboard (Score:1)
Good For.. (Score:1)
Linux....PDA market
The product doesn't look extra-ordinary, but looks like once Sharp goes on to promote it, it'd do better than the existing trends in the market. Good for all.
Any more information? (Score:2)
Sharp Zaurus PDA (Score:3, Interesting)
206 mhz Strongarm VS 200 mhz pentium? (Score:1, Redundant)
I'm starting to think it's either time to upgrade my desktop, or consider using an embeded OS to speed things up.
I'll definitely buy it... (Score:3, Funny)
Looks good. (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't really see what Java and Linux bring to a handheld device. Development isn't that difficult for the Palm OS, even Pocket PC, which have each picked a niche in the handheld market (the Palm OS for basic PIM functions with lots of little add-on software, Pocket PC for built-in support of Office documents and multimedia). I have spent some time thinking about it, and the advantages of Linux (multitasking, different processor support, open source) don't seem as important in the handheld market. At least not yet. If Palm OS and the Pocket PC platforms weren't mature, I would definately think that using Linux would be a much better choice. Unfortunately, it is still quite immature, as one can quickly tell from reading through the Linux development mailing lists of the Agenda [agendacomputing.com]. Not to say it isn't useful, but on the same hardware it seems to be slower than the Palm equivalents, from the reports I have read.
Moving on, the choice of compact flash and lithium ion battery was very wise. Better than a proprietary expansion slot, in my opinion, but somewhat more limited. Handspring's sprinboards are capable of doing so much more than memory expansion and modem/ethernet devices - like a remote module, GPS, cell phone, wireless internet, etc. I am not sure how many of these things the compact flash design on this palmtop could support - with something sticking out the top. Seeing as this has a 206 Mhz processor and a color screen, the good rechargable battery will be quite needed. It would be nice if these are easily removable, so that those who don't get a chance to charge for quite some time will be able to pop in a second battery.
The sliding keyboard seems nice, but obviously useful mostly for "thumb-typing". Handspring just announced a clip-on sort of keyboard for their devices that does a similar thing - SnapNType [palmgear.com]. One thing that I wonder about this Sharp device - will it support handwriting recognition? The site claims the color screen has "touch panel support". Handwriting recognition is fairly difficult to code, as the Agenda creators have found. Grafiti is nice, especially for those that have learned it, but there is some sort of licensing with it.
All in all, this looks like a promising Linux handheld. They learned from the Agenda's mistakes, by including USB connectivity, a rechargable battery, and compact flash slot. With all these features it will definately be in the price range of the already-mature color Compaq's, which means a limited consumer base. I look forward to hearing how well the developer models work.
love the input options. (Score:2)
Please pardon. (Score:1)
good and bad (Score:1)
but as long as they keep making shiny things, I'll keep buying them.
now off to get some tin foil.... oooooo
maybe someone can answer this (Score:1)
StrongARM comments (Score:5, Interesting)
2) It is RISC rather than CISC, and having used a 200MHz StrongARM desktop I can tell you it FLIES. Much faster than a P2-266
3) You use gcc to compile on StrongARM because Linux runs on StrongARM (well obviously). ARMLinux has been around for years running on Acorn machines. You can also cross-compile to StrongARM using a x86 box - just
4) You can even use them for Beowolf [dnaco.net]
Phillip.
Secure Digital Expansion Slot?? (Score:1)
I see a slot for headphones, but I don't see a claim for "plays MP3s".
Zuarus PDA is AmigaDE enabled. (Score:1, Interesting)
Using Linux pieces does make sense though as you can use them freely and even gives you more news coverage. These devices are extremely cool, but NO way are they true Linux devices.
MPEG4 movies listed under features? (Score:1)
On http://developer.sharpsec.com/ [sharpsec.com] one of the listed features is "Headset Port", and the subtext is "Stereo headset port for listening to MP3 audio files or MPEG4 movies". Anyone know what that means in this case?
There's no room in the marketplace (Score:2)
Anyway, this is not the time, economy wise, to be trying to introduce a completely new product in a genre of questionable usefulness. My TRGpro spends only about one in five days out of its drawer, and I really like it, I just can't find a use for it that justifies lugging it around. (Particularly now summer is on it's way.)
Needs better connectivity (Score:2)
The USB is a nice touch, but it looks like it might get in the way of the CF slot.
I see the real possibilities in a Linux powered device like this is in integration into larger system and field based data collection. There's no way anybody is going to break into the PalmOS/WinCE dominated world.
The problem is when you start assembling systems to do things like field surveying systems, the features you get don't add up (e.g. you need a huge CF card to hold your maps files, but then yo have no way to connect your GPS). I do a lot of (simple) stuff with GPS hand PDAs -- I think every PDA should have a serial port!
Remember the Yopy? (Score:1)
Sharp's Open Operating Website (Score:1)
Looks like Sharp have not embraced the Open Source movement beyond PDAs yet...
Guess they have to start somewhere
Developer Registration Prob (Score:1)
Error Occurred While Processing Request
Error Diagnostic Information
ODBC Error Code = 37000 (Syntax error or access violation)
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Can't allocate space for object 'Syslogs' in database 'Zaurus' because the 'logsegment' segment is full. If you ran out of space in Syslogs, dump the transaction log. Otherwise, use ALTER DATABASE or sp_extendsegment to increase the size of the segment.
The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier of (CFQUERY), occupying document position (19:2) to (19:49).
Date/Time: 10/08/01 09:20:41
Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 4.0; Hotbar 3.0)
Remote Address: 168.236.254.1
HTTP Referer: http://developer.sharpsec.com/join.cfm?Blue=RE
Template: D:\Inetpub\wwwroot\developer\join_writerecord.cfm
Please inform the site administrator that this error has occurred (be sure to include the contents of this page in your message to the administrator).
When do we get a Linux PDA for engineers? (Score:1)
There is already a plethora of PDAs for accountants and salespeople, but the niche for engineers remains largely unfilled. What a perfect spot for Linux! Give us something that will do the math, do the analysis, hook up to networks, and crunch the data without costing us $5,000.
Our group is very interested in a PDA network analyzer that can compete with the Flukes. Yet every damn PDA comes out as a clone of Palm. Get a clue folks... even the Palms aren't selling!!
It seems to me that a Linux-based PDA with appropriate interfaces (10/100 ethernet would be perfect) would find several niche markets. Out of the several Linux PDAs (and our firm has a couple of them) this Sharp is the ONLY one which has any useable connetivity. I wonder if the OS (based on Lineo's) is up to the challenge.
Re:Why thye chose Opera?` (Score:1)
Re:Why thye chose Opera?` (Score:1)
Mozilla is way too large both in footprint and running memory still. It's slow too.
Nanozilla on nanoX might be a lot better but that's a different story.