Slashdot Log In
Home Cookin': The Electric CD Acid Test
Posted by
Hemos
on Wed Oct 20, 1999 06:40 PM
from the dear-lord-the-mind-boggles dept.
from the dear-lord-the-mind-boggles dept.
XenonOfArcticus writes "In the spirit if the Blair Witch Project: In 1993, Chris (Hanson), Dave (Kessner), Bob (Maple), Eric Schultz, Chris Hurtt, Earl Miles, and a few other malcontents found themselves in the possession of a microwave oven, a video camera, some worthless CD-ROMs, and a (then state-of-the-art) Video Toaster editing system. This recently-discovered footage is the actual result. " The mind boggles - the video is in QuickTime 4 format. Update: chrisd writes "I have mirrored the Home Cooking movie here." Update: 10/22 11:02 by H :Us e the mirror above, as, the Slashdot effect totally slaughtered the poor guy's ISP in the original story.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Home Cookin': The Electric CD Acid Test
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 136 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
|
2
(1)
|
2
Whatever happened to quickies, anyway? (Score:5)
---
"'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.
some cool experiments (Score:3)
View in Linux (Score:3)
How do I view this thing in Linux?
Not to harass the matter, but I am quite curious as to the state of Quicktime support for Linux . . .
Re:View in Linux (Score:4)
Considering that such a high percentage of us (relative to most web sites anyway) run Linux, I think the management should avoid posting links to videos using the new (Sorensen?) Quicktime 4.0 codec.
Perhaps a boycott is in order?
Microwaving CDs just looks soooo cool! (Score:4)
Note: the show's over after 1-2 seconds. After that the plastic will start to burn and smoke (toxic!) so microwave for no more than 2 seconds. Also, I set the cd on top of a small glass so the CD is no where near any of the walls inside the oven. All this, of course, is at your own risk if you choose to do this. No problems have resulted for me, though.
Mirror List (Score:3)
ftp://128.253.254.56/homecookin.mov [128.253.254.56]
http://dibona.com/slashmir [dibona.com]
SlashMirror: Where to put files for fellow /.'ers
Sorenson Codec (Score:4)
Xanim and Sorenson Codec (Score:3)
If we all email them maybe they will get a clue.
For reference, Xanim's home page (and mirrors)
http://xanim.va.pubnix.com/home.html [pubnix.com]
http://smurfland.cit.buffalo.edu/xanim/home.html [buffalo.edu]
http://xanim.resnet.gatech.edu/home.html [gatech.edu]
Hello,
You're receiving this note because you asked for QuickTime for Linux, QuickTime for UNIX, or QuickTime for Amiga.
QuickTime is available for Mac OS http://www.apple.com/macos [apple.com], Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows NT 4. The next platform to be supported will be Mac OS X http://www.apple.com/macosx [apple.com] (including Mac OS X Server), which is Mach/BSD-based.
If you're interested in QuickTime for platforms other than Mac or Windows, contact your platform vendor and let them know that you would like them to license QuickTime from Apple.
If you're interested in QuickTime as it relates to servers, be sure to check out the standards-based Darwin streaming server project http://publicsource.apple.com [apple.com] (which works with any standards-based streaming media client).
Thank you,
--
Charles Wiltgen [mailto]
QuickTime Technology Manager
Worldwide Developer Relations Apple Computer, Inc. "Don't compromise. Use QuickTime."
http://www.apple.com/quicktime [apple.com]
http://www.QuickTimeFAQ.org [quicktimefaq.org]
QuickTime 4: The first standards-based architecture for networked media.
Recognized as the industry standard for Macintosh and Windows since 1991.
MPEG version (Score:4)
You can get the original quick time version, as well as mpeg versions at varying bit rates from http://house.ofdoom.com/~hungerf 3/video/index.rxml [ofdoom.com]
I'm sitting here with a stopwatch, and a fire extinguisher to see how long this server stands up.
(pentium 120, 96 megs of ram, FreeBSD, Roxen, on a tci-met cable modem)
I mirrored it for everyone. (Score:3)
Chris DiBona
--
Grant Chair, Linux Int.
VP, SVLUG
CD Testing (Score:5)
Travis
Re:View in Linux (Score:5)
This attitude that "Linux rules! I can't do X on Linux, so X sucks" is completely rediculous. If Linux is not adequate for your needs, then that is your issue not ours.
Every operating system has it's advantages and disadvantages. Quicktime is a pretty open standard, available on the vast majority of computer systems. If yours is not one of them, then that is your limitation.
Alternatively, do what those of us that want to run *nix apps that are available for Linux and Windows apps do, run NT and Linux. Either run Linux in VMWare, or set up a second box. There are a plethora of Xservers for NT, some commercial, some freeware. That way, you can run all applications.
You could run a VMWare session with Win95/98/NT, which would give your more application options. However, please don't extrapolate that because you use Linux and that many others use Linux that everyone here can only use Linux.
An operating system is a tool, it runs applications. If your operating system lacks applications that you want to run, it is time to come up with an alternative plan of action.
I'm certain that one day, Linux will have loads of applications, be as easy to use as Windows, and reliably, and the applications will run as reliably as Win32 apps (meaning, not very well), in the mean time, realize the Unix has been used for 30 years, and X for 15 years, but neither was designed as a desktop system. It's great that we have one, but it lacks full desktop support. Accept the limitations, don't force other to conform.
Linux (at least on my School's AFS system) has lots of great commercial engineering tools, because it is Unix-like enough to run them. I can't get them for NT. However, for streaming video, mainstream environments are where it is at.
If you want to do everything, get multiple systems. If you wish to do everything easily, pipe them into the same machine. If not, keep your issues to yourself, and don't demand that amusing links not be shown here because you choose to limit your options.
Alex
Re:View in Linux (Score:3)
If there's another, better, format available, then sure. But if there's no other format, posting the Quicktime 4 link is better than posting no link at all, just as posting info about a Linux-only program is worse than posting a link to a highly ported program, but is better than posting no link at all.
Re:View in Linux (Score:5)
But yeah, I agree, just because something isn't in Linux doesn't mean it sucks. However, to claim that QT4 is available on the vast majority of systems... well, on installed personal computers, maybe, but two OSes each on one platform certainly does NOT constitute the majority of the several hundred OSes and platforms out there. What if you don't even have an x86 box? What if you have a BeBox or an Alpha, or something StrongARM based, or an RS/6000, or a SPARC? Not everyone has a Mac or a Windows-capable box, after all.
---
"'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.
Safety Precaution (Score:5)