zogger's Journal: Nope, not paranoid

...just somewhat a fan of history and a firm denier of geopolitical coincidences. I'm a skeptic when supposedly "odd" things occur with high stakes politics.

Do you remember that weird "smallpox scare" story from a couple weeks back, when some airline passenger was claiming he had smallpox and was hauled off, then later they claimed he was just mental, etc? Well, the plot thickens, this wasn't joe sixpack,no indeedy it wasn't, and funny they didn't mention who it was at the time, it turns out this was the top navy medico, a rear admiral to boot, making this claim, and he is now locked up (safely away from pesky reporters, etc)in a hospital.

http://www.wbtv.com/news/6734211.html

now, watchoo think on that? Go ahead, get wild about it. Coincidence?? Or, as I think, a guilty conscious in advance and the stress became too high. Or trying to save his skin knowing he was being setup, so he got himself pulled off the plane publically? Something like that, think about it, see what you come up with.

Anthrax scare in the news after the 911 attack.

[nlinecomputers]

Reminds me of the days after 9-11. All the news agencies at the time kept harping on about Anthrax being the next most likely form of attack. It was practically the only thing mentioned. I thought at the time, "Why Anthrax? Why not Small pox, or a nuke, or even a good ole car bomb in a mall parking lot?"

Then in just a few weeks we have an Anthrax attack, and we have also learned that it was Anthrax based on our own Government strain of it.

I always thought that the newsies were tipped off and told to pump u

yes

[zogger]

The patriot act vote coincided with the anthrax attack, just WAY too cute and coincidental. Not even close to hiding it either, just a warning to the newsies and the congress-playball or else.

Re:

[Marxist Hacker 42]

Remember 911 and ask yourself how a building not hit by a plane can fall down just like a planned demolition.

Maybe a building damaged by other debris from the plane accident is no longer safe, and so was taken down in a planned demolition that was overlooked by the news media for the protection of the rescuers?

Re:

[nlinecomputers]

It takes weeks of planning and work to properly take a building down. WTC7 fell into it's own footprint. I can't see how damage to one side of a building could cause that. And why did it take until 4 in the afternoon for it to fall? If debris took out it's supports should it not have gone down the moment it was hit by the debris? And why didn't it topple as basic high school physics implies that it would?

If it was a planned demolition why hasn't someone who did the work spoken up and called the 911truth g

disagree

[zogger]

I think the evidence is *overwhelming* it was taken down with controlled demolition. As to motive..man, take over of the US government, patriot act passed (or cut to the chase and call it the enabling act version 2, because it fits), expanded war in the middle east (huge US/UK presence on the ground smack in the middle of the golden oil triangle)(see PNAC docs for that, planned in advance), trillions in spending costs that selected large companies profit from, getting the US to act as the shock troops for i