Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Waaaah! More censorship! Waaaaaaaaaa! (Score 4, Interesting) 198

The cure for speech you don't like is your own speech against it,

This works in normal life:
A> yay hitler
B, C, D> fuck you nazi piece of shit
onlookers E-Z> wow nobody likes A, I shouldn't be a nazi

But it explicitly does not work when the Social Cancer algorithm is in control:
A> yay hitler
B, C, D> fuck you nazi piece of shit
Social Cancer algorithm: "Wow, A really got a lot of engagement on that post, let's push it to more people."
random people E-Z: "huh, this nazi guy seems to get a lot of attention...

Just like bad money pushes out good and lies spread faster than the truth, negative garbage content pushes out good because we've introduced a curator who is a sociopath that was never taught the difference between good and bad attention. To give a concrete example: There is an entire industrial scale operation that revolves around posting fucktarded "hack" videos to youtube because it doesn't matter if you're posting "this is a bullshit hack because [obvious things]", you still clicked on it and engaged with it and that's all the Social Cancer algorithm cares about.

Forget censorship, I just want to go back to the world where shouting bad shit down means it's shouted down, not actively promoted.

Comment Re:uh no (Score 2) 173

The cost to Ukraine is horrible.

But the Russians have repeatedly and explicitly stated that they intend to commit cultural genocide. Pro tip for any aspiring dictators out there - don't announce that out front. If your intended victims know you intend to murder every man, rape every woman and abduct the children, they'll fight to the death 'cause there's nothing to lose.

Comment Re: uh no (Score 5, Insightful) 173

What did anyone do to "provoke" Russia? Normally stuff that would be considered as "yeah you were askin for it" are actions like massing troops on the border or stationing tactical missiles nearby in a ready-to-launch stance.

But we all know what the Ukrainian people actually did to provoke Russian Hitler: Force out the corrupt leaders who were openly colluding with Russia loot the country, and refusing to take part in his absolutely insane delusions of recreating the USSR. Fun fact: If you're ever wondering why the bots are so determined for you to specifically hate Soros - it's because the Soros Foundation actively funds anti-corruption pro-democracy efforts throughout eastern europe.

Comment Re:No one asked for the screens (Score 1) 245

The bean counters who care about one thing only: Physical buttons cost money *HISSSSSSS*

We've all probably seen so many cases in cars of "wow, good job dumbfuck, you saved five cents by doing it the dipshit way... and guaranteed that this part will routinely fail." Some examples from my old ford explorer:

* HVAC blend box servo gears are all plastic. It's a teeny motor with 3 stages of speed step down. The first gear being plastic is basically guaranteed to snap teeth or just wear down to nothing. This is literally a $0.15 part in millions quantities FFS.
* Plastic engine thermostat housing. The gasket is basically guaranteed to fail every few 10s of thousands of miles because of the expansion mismatch between plastic and aluminum. Mine now has its 4th and final housing because I replaced it with a cast aluminum one.
* 5r55 transmission servos are basically guaranteed to fail by 150Kmi because there is no sleeve for the servo stems, just the soft aluminum of the tranny case. Two little rubber gaskets on the servo cover the problem up, which should've never existed because there should be a brass sleeve for this exact reason.
* The use of plastic chain tensioners for the OHCs are a ticking timebomb not just for Explorers but all vehicles equipped with that series of v6/v8 sohc engines. Somewhere between 150 and 250Kmi, they will break.

On a vehicle that originally retailed for $28500, all of the above bad designs might have saved $50 on production relative to doing it right. And yet these four things were among the principal contributors to the infamous reliability problems of early 2000s Explorers, alongside the stupidest decision of all: omitting a transmission fluid cooler by default. But you can't put "destruction of entire vehicle series' reputation" on a spreadsheet so beancounters don't care.

Comment This isn't a comical bubble at all (Score 1) 25

According to The New York Times, the deal is reportedly valued at about $7.5 billion, with $1.5 billion allocated to OpenRouter's founders. Less than three months ago the company was valued at about $1.3 billion. CNBC reports:

This is normal, non-insane valuation in a market that is definitely not a bubble more inflated that the Bootes supervoid.

Comment You were so so focused on whether you could... (Score 1) 81

... you never stop to ask if... wait, not thinking about whether you should shouldn't matter, because it takes absolutely zero seconds of thought to see that the answer is fucking NO.

In the case of generative AI, there exist legitimate applications and it took a minute to see that it's a really bad fucking idea. But using it to make new viruses? Come the hell on, man.

Comment Re:Stick but no carrot (Score 1) 59

Listening to the cult of globalization (i.e. free trade in capital, i.e. recreating the race to the bottom that characterized the robber baron age in America at the scale of the entire world) is a 100% self-pwn on our part.

But China's government absolutely, positively, one hundred percent actively works to undercut American (and anyone else) competition in markets they want to control. Their government can prop up Chinese companies dumping X on the market longer than any private enterprise company mining or making X can hold out.

That's how they wiped out every American solar panel manufacturer: Dumping panels on the market for less than they cost to make. That's how they wiped out every single rare earth mine they don't control. It's how they wiped out western steel and aluminum making for everything except exotic high-cost alloys and defense applications.

Comment Re:The speed of light? (Score 1) 59

It's been a long time, but the US government's illegal mass wiretapping program was originally "exposed" in part because they installed a signal splitter in a San Francisco AT&T network house where the transoceanic cable came onshore. The network admins removed the unexplained fiber splitter going to a locked room because it dropped the signal strength enough that the legitimate transceivers were complaining.

Comment Re: Transceivers are not a security risk (Score 1) 59

You think that you're going to put a processor capable of interposing itself between two sources of traffic reaching 28, 56 or 112 gigabaud per channel, process and MITM that data at line rate, store more than a millisecond's worth of it on the gigabytes of memory this processor will have (you'll need a full speed ddr4 channel to keep up), exfiltrate copies (to... uh... somewhere) that totally won't be noticed by performance and network monitoring both...

And do all of this, with the 1-2 watts of power you MIGHT be able to steal from the transceiver's socket without tripping a power and eventually thermal shutdown?

Comment Re:And, what lie are they using this time? (Score 2) 59

You think you're going to "dead bug" a processor capable of spying on a 28 gigabaud (or faster) link, by definition at line rate, into a device the size of an SFP transceiver? Actually let's back up one. You think there's a processor inside an SFP transceiver that you can attach a spy to? The things have as much brains as a battery charge controller. Their job is to provide stable DC bias to the receiver PIN diodes and the laser emitters, and in present datacenter units to have either 28, 56 or 110GHz of analog mo/dem bandwidth. To that end, they have a micro-brain in their ASIC silicon that lets I2C find out what's going on and how hot the unit is, that's it.

Now let's just snap our fingers and imagine that's possible. Oh, and there's also an entire bank of nvme drives to allow this "dead bugged" spy processor to store more than a millisecond of captured data. This also definitely fits inside the SFP transceiver, and doesn't parasitize more than the 1-2W you'll have available. What, exactly, do you plan to do with it now? If you're the SFP (and not the QSFP or OSFP) you're plugged into the host, but you have no access to it (seriously - *SFP transceivers are dumb).

Are you going to tell me that this "deadbugged" spy processor is actually an interposer with its own entire network stack that can inject outbound data? Because you know, these sorts of networks, they come with guarantees on latency that are either sub microsecond (ethernet) or sub 100 nanoseconds (infiniband). Good luck not stepping on timing margins like -that-.

More like, "with an entire engineering team and being handed power and cooling for free, I could insert an interposer into the rack that could spy on whatever line I asked the DCOs to plug into it."

All of which is a very long way to say you have no idea what you're talking about. There's places in hardware threat actors can attack you. Those places are the BIOSes of your servers. When was the last time you updated your laptop's bios? If it's more than a year I about guarantee you there's multiple CVEs out for it that Fancy Bear or Fancy Panda could utilize.

Slashdot Top Deals

"We live, in a very kooky time." -- Herb Blashtfalt

Working...