Comment Re:Wind, Solar and Batteries are cheaper and clean (Score 2) 180
I love how the idea that nuclear power taking 100% account for its waste products up front, as they are produced, is portrayed as a NEGATIVE.
You know, as opposed to throwing billions of tons of pollution up into the air, along with so much mercury that everyone in the world now has a lifetime allowance for seafish, not to mention all the radioactivity from the uranium in the coal, or the fly ash piles that would set off the alarms at most nuclear plants and destroy entire ecosystems when they get rained on and burst.
Guess what everyone - we're all gonna pay a WAY higher price for burning all the buried carbon than we EVER will for all the world's atomic waste. It just won't be on a fucking beancounter's spreadsheet labelled "cost of CO2 release."
You know, as opposed to throwing billions of tons of pollution up into the air, along with so much mercury that everyone in the world now has a lifetime allowance for seafish, not to mention all the radioactivity from the uranium in the coal, or the fly ash piles that would set off the alarms at most nuclear plants and destroy entire ecosystems when they get rained on and burst.
Guess what everyone - we're all gonna pay a WAY higher price for burning all the buried carbon than we EVER will for all the world's atomic waste. It just won't be on a fucking beancounter's spreadsheet labelled "cost of CO2 release."