They probably never dreamed big companies would put these cheap boards in everything.
I'd be surprised if they didn't. Industrial computers were stupidly priced before the Raspberry Pi. Lots of them still are. And industrial customers care much more about whether the drivers work than whether they're open source.
"Word-guessing?" How does this naive notion persist?
It's true. Kind of. Just enough to make a catchy false premise.
Also, the human brain is barely comfortable with binary. It does not like probability, much less distributions. It especially doesn't like conditional distributions.
They don't need contractors for that
They do need contractors for that. That's what the contractors are doing. The model produces a couple of outputs and a human chooses which one they think is better. That goes in the training data. You can also ask the same or another model which is better, but that defeats the purpose.
(A) AI output has no copyright. There may be copyright from stolen training data still in place though if the AI produces too verbatim. The latter may beg worse with numerous pending lawsuits.
Indeed. And that gives at the absolute least gross negligence. That would make them liable for all damage done. But I suspect more is possible.
not that it matters given EU is completely irrelevant in this space anyway.
Hahaha, no. Microsoft, Google, etc. though that as well until the first really large fines came rolling in.
Well, we may get lucky as the manipulators may do to things on the cheap. Oligarchs may simply be incompetent as fascists. Will definitely be interesting to watch.
Police generally don't need a warrant to request security camera footage or obtain it voluntarily. They need a warrant to compel the owner to give it to them.
Whether the owner volunteers footage and under what conditions they do so is pretty much up to them. Ring used to be pretty free about it but clamped down when it became controversial. Public sources like traffic cameras are likewise up to the public agency or government that owns them and they often have privacy laws or policies that might require warrants.
Flock is obviously motivated to cooperate with police requests since that's the service they're providing. It isn't "the way it's always been" but the OP's suggestion of requiring warrants could be easily implemented. Tapping phones without a warrant was perfectly legal in the US until it became a problem and a law was passed.
Like this one?
Why do assholes like you stipulate an emotional stance?
Systemd is simply bad software, so it has no place on my systems.
Actually I learned how to solve the halting problem in practice (in Operating Systems 101, no less): Just pull the plug.
Yes, very much so. Unfortunately, a rather large part of the human race is very easy to manipulate and does not get this at all.
And, incidentally, the EU already has pretty reasonable regulation. Copy that.
Your weird unfounded claim isn't really worthy of much of a reply. But for any innocent who's reading and is tempted by the bitcoin bro nonsense, here's Satoshi's whitepaper:
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pd...
Quoting:
transactions are hashed in a Merkle Tree [7][2][5],
There's a diagram too. Those references are:
[7] R.C. Merkle, "Protocols for public key cryptosystems," In Proc. 1980 Symposium on Security and
Privacy, IEEE Computer Society, pages 122-133, April 1980.
[2] H. Massias, X.S. Avila, and J.-J. Quisquater, "Design of a secure timestamping service with minimal
trust requirements," In 20th Symposium on Information Theory in the Benelux, May 1999.
[5] S. Haber, W.S. Stornetta, "Secure names for bit-strings," In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference
on Computer and Communications Security, pages 28-35, April 1997.
As you might guess, the paper by Merkle is the one that proposed the cryptographic hash tree arrangement that we now call "Merkle trees." Here it is:
https://www.ralphmerkle.com/pa...
Or the Wikipedia article about it:
The faster I go, the behinder I get. -- Lewis Carroll
