Comment Re:If you don't hire entry-level workers now... (Score 1) 64
You expect MBA morons to think 7 (!) years into the future? They can barely manage 6 months. On a good day.
You expect MBA morons to think 7 (!) years into the future? They can barely manage 6 months. On a good day.
It can hardly get any worse than that. Unless this is a freak accident, looks like Boeing is really done for, even if the plane was 11 years old.
The thing is that we do not have statements about what is on the recordings. Take into account that a double engine-failure on takeoff is about the worst thing possible and then think about what that might mean for Boeing, and things become political.
Also crash investigations always use multiple approaches when things look surprising. As they do here.
Yes. But it does not keep long by itself. So the RAT deploys automatically to not drain that battery fast.
Sounds like it. I doubt you can display any lower understanding of things. ChatGPT statement without any human review or terminally dumb human?
Yep. Somebody there does not even have a minimal clue how things work.
Before they have completed at the very least Stage 1 human trials, this is all without significance.
Different from you I can read. The news articles are all predictions, hopes, fears, etc.. They do not describe changes that have actually happened.
And being cheaper and better at it on top of that.
Indeed. Underestimating China is a really bad mistake at this time.
Hackathons do bits and pieces of cool stuff.
Typically they do the hard stuff.
No. "Hard stuff" takes a lot more time than they have. And probably more skill and education as well. "Cool, flashy" stuff is all they can do.
Yes, it does.
You seem to be deep in delusion. Just one example:
In fact, LLM models already show signs of ageing because updating training data gets more and more tricky due to too much AI Slop out there and model collapse.
Ah yes, “model collapse”—that ominous phrase you definitely didn’t just make up on the fly to sound authoritative.
So, your claim is I have made up the term "model collapse"? Well, here is a reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
You think something I made up "on the fly to sound authoritative" has a Wikipedia page with 25 references going back to 2022?
The rest of your statement is of similar quality, i.e. simply crap.
I dare you to find a single posting by me that says LLMs are useless. Or eat your lie.
Yu know what? It looks less likely every day that this use case will really work out. LLMs continue to be as dumb and disconnected as bread and hallucinate on top of that. Training data gets more and more outdated. Scaling LLMs up or iterate things (falsely called "reasoning") seems to do very little compared to the additional effort needed. And more signs that this AI hype is again 98% hype and 2% substance. Like all other AI hypes before.
My prediction is that in 5 years we will be going into the next AI Winter and the usual morons will claim that there was no way to see that coming. Then in 15 to 20 years, we will get the next deranged AI hype. And so on, because people do not learn form history.
Whatever is not nailed down is mine. Whatever I can pry up is not nailed down. -- Collis P. Huntingdon, railroad tycoon