Comment many times over the years I've had prime trials (Score 2) 29
and every single time, un-enrolling was super easy.
But one thing is what I think, and a very different one is what a judge and/or jury think.
JM2C
YMMV
and every single time, un-enrolling was super easy.
But one thing is what I think, and a very different one is what a judge and/or jury think.
JM2C
YMMV
You nija'd me. But I will add that nVIDIA and AMD AI GPUs can be used for HPC. Nuclear weapons modeling, climate models, seismic exploration, aerodynamics (CFD), finite model analysis. The posibilities for reuse are endless
"TSMC and Samsumg have fabs in the USoA"
How long before the tangerine terror fucks that up?
Your question is valid. The answer is simple. the "Tangerine Terror" can only stop new fabs getting here. The fabs that TSMC and Samsung already have in USoAn soil will remain there AND be upgraded.
The sole process of building a fab that can sustain the cleanliness needed for chipmaking (significantly more clean particle wise than an Operating Room, although less asceptic) is super-Expensive. even before you deploy the Litho Equipment. Also, the load bearing on the ceiling for the waffer transport pods is out of this world. Also, moving around the litho equipment after deployment is super expensive too (revalidation and re-calibration galore)
Also, with the world the way it is, neither Samsung nor TSMC can afford to risk full stop production in the mother-land due to military action (NorK or China), or to Earthquakes (Pacific Fire Ring). So they will keep building outside of their motherland. Be that the USoA, Canada or europe, Who knows?
So, is not like Samsumg or TSMC will vacate the USoAn fabs and let the buildings go delerict, or sell the empty husks of the buildings to "someone else" for pennies on the dollar.
If they get feed up with the "Orange Terror", they will stop new GreenField fab building, expansion projects, and maybe even cancel projects in very early stages of construction, but very advanced constrution or operational fabs will go ahead.
I agree 107% with you. Just a few points:
Samsung is an option for fabinng advanced chips.
TSMC and Samsumg have fabs in the USoA
nVIDIA already worked with samsung (RTX 30x0 and similar AI chips)
nVIDIA invested in Intel because it is cheeeeeeap right now AAAAAND because, in the current political climate, investing in a non-USoAn company is frowned upon.
Samsung is still an option if TSMC and Intel fail. Not as good as TSMC, but leading edge enough.
Loongson is a very capable MIPS derived design. Its claim to fame was a set of extensions that accelerated emulation of X86 VMs via QEMU.
nVIDIA,meanwhile, is NOT interested in X86 (or MIPS, for that matter). They are interested on ARM for the short and medium term, and on RISC-V for the long term.
Try the same idea agai, but with an ARM or RISC-V company as the acquisition target.
And about the geopolitical implications of acquiring a chinese processor developer, I will not talk.
And please remember that nVIDIA also makes networking gear (mellanox aquisition) and miscelaneous chips. So, it would not be out of the questions to throw intel a bone, and fab that (and not AI chips) on intel.
Six months will save money, yes, but will not allow the executives to focus on long term goals
A more worthy goal would be to report AND PAY TAXES every 4 months. More steady income for the IRS, less reporting burden for companies.
We can harvest twice, or even thrice a year, and we now have computers to aid the record keeping instead of scribes and abacus...
Yearly taxes are an anachronism from early non-automated agricultural society...
JM2C
YMMV
How much CPU power does a machine have that can't run a 64bit OS and browser? Would such a machine cope with even a single tab of a modern bloated website?
You would be surprised what some 32 bit only machines can do.
But at this stage, most machines running a 32 bit OS are machines capable of 64 bit operation, but that have a very expensive or very critical peripheral that has only 32 bit drivers.
Train a coding AI model just on BSD, MIT, ISC, APACHE, WTFPL, CC0 and compatible licensed code, and only accept code generated by that model.
Easy peasy.
and Start Writing Bazaars of Improvisation
You should not use Amazon Family even if you do live in the same household.
The system Amazon has devised is an Unacceptable security risk.
The problem is the new "program" requires that you Make all your Payment methods, such as your credit card, available for everyone else in the household -- They can click a button in the Family section of their Account management to automatically add your credit card to their Amazon wallet.
That means, for example.. If you wanted to share Prime delivery with your Elderly parent you are housing; They can go into their Amazon account and instantly add Your credit card, and then make a purchase on you instead of using their own card. Also, If they set their password to 1234 or their account gets hacked, and let a few other people access their account, now your account suddenly has a massive issue as well, and there is really no way to manage this risk. You just have to trust your family members more than is due or warranted in most cases.. Spouses often have some non-Joint bank accounts and cards for Personal and Joint for the household costs only - the very deliberate reason of not putting all the eggs in one basket, and making sure people retain a level of independence, and still have their own funds allocated just for each person's personal usage.
Chilax. While what you say is technically true (which is the best kind of true), nowadays many banks offer "virtual pre-paid credit cards" to compliment the one you have. If anyone is so concerned with this "loophole", they may as well set up one for "Amazon-Family" Stuff, and use that one only for amazon.
So, the europeans (union) are so lazy that they let their leader fly in a plain Flacon 900LX plane?!
Actually you'll find this fascination with hardening transport for leaders is an almost uniquely American thing among democracies. I say among democracies because dictatorships surround themselves by military for obvious reasons.
[...]
Your president hides in a bullet proof truck costing tax payers millions.
I am not an USoAn, but I live in one of those "dictatorships" you allude (if you care about which one, you can search my comment history). So I hope you understand my confusion. Your information was interesting.
Having said that, I still do believe that a president/head of state has to have a dedicated plane, with heightened security and more roboust flight systems. It does not have to be a 747 decorated in Gold leaf with every conceivable luxury inside, but rather something utilitarian, that does the job and does not crash while doing it.
I did not find that the plane had military-grade systems. The picture from the Bulgarian information services shows a Falcon 900LX aircraft registration OO-GPE, belonging to Luxaviation Belgium. It's a civilian jet that any other day it be carrying CEOs or celebrities. https://www.ainonline.com/avia...
So, the europeans (union) are so lazy that they let their leader fly in a plain Flacon 900LX plane?!
Not a miliatry hardened/modified Falcon 900XL Plane?!
While a land war rages in europe (the continent) cor ~3 years now!
Les mots me manquent.
Maybe, but how many regular commercial ships and planes have access to this military grade stuff?
I'd wager the plane of the president of the eurpean union has access to the military grade stuff. And that is the plane TFS and TFA mention explicitly . So....
Slowly and surely the unix crept up on the Nintendo user ...