*The article cites statistics that 18% of those drivers involved in fatal crashes were speeding.
Which means 82% of those drivers involved in fatal crashes were NOT speeding.
Not speeding is obviously much deadlier than speeding.
Should we prohibit driving under speed limit?
Autonomous vehicles do solve the parking shortage problem.
I stop at Starbucks for a coffee and instruct my car to circle the block until I'm ready to leave.
Creating more traffic.
The problems with human driven cars is erratic driving, by which I mean even slight variations in speed, such as rubbernecking at car accidents, cause those waves in traffic which are responsible for jams. Automated driving, when coordinated by inter-vehicle communications that can "see" past multiple cars in front of you, have the potential to keep traffic flowing.
And then a hacker could come in and create an epic traffic jam.
That's bullshit. The internet worked fine before there was Google, and while it's showing its age, it'll continue to work fine if Google and Facebork disappear (we but can dream...)
Your statement is bullshit. Search before Google was painful beyond belief. I changed half a dozen search engines before I switched to Google.
A man is not complete until he is married -- then he is finished.