Comment Re:Puzzles (Score 1) 134
Text adventures are still alive these days, but not so much commercial. More like "fan (interactive) fiction". For example: https://ifcomp.org/
Text adventures are still alive these days, but not so much commercial. More like "fan (interactive) fiction". For example: https://ifcomp.org/
Enterprise architecture or solution architecture. (That's real architecture, not the programmer/analyst kind).
It's not as interesting as programming but it's better than working. I still get my programming fix by doing Project Euler problems.
I don't get it; what's the big deal? I was getting my car serviced at home 30 years ago ("Lubemobile" was just one of the outfits that did this). Is this model only now just getting to the USA? Welcome to the 1980s, Seppos.
I found the loop that was being infinite, but didn't know what it was supposed to be doing instead of being infinite. So I had to wait for the guy who knew (who was asleep on a railway station bench, having missed the last train home to Gosford the night before) to get home so I could call him and then wait for him to drive the 60 KM or so to the Sydney CBD where I was with the dump.
So I missed the 5.00 am deadline, but luckily it was Friday (well, Saturday by now) so they were able to defer things.
Reading a core dump on a System 390 (running MVS / OS/390 / etc) machine.
It's 3.00 am and the program has crashed after running for 6 hours. You can't re-run it, you have to find out why it crashed, fix it, and checkpoint-restart to completion. You have until 5.00 am. Your time starts now. Oh - and it's PL/I. An infinite loop in an IMS/DB program. Be afraid.
The ONLY information you have is the core dump, the program listing (albeit with object map), the linker map, and maybe - if you're lucky - a DB dump.
Did I mention it's a program you've never seen before? Those who have seen it are recovering from the party to celebrate a week of successful running. But they're not the ones on call that week, are they?
Ah, 1984. What a year.
Loathe = deep-seated hatred
Nope.
loathe = despise.
It's a verb, not a noun (which 'deep-seated hatred' is).
For the first year of its availability, Windows 10 is available for free to most Windows 7 and 8 users, and Microsoft has been trying to coax those users to make the switch by delivering the operating system through Windows Update. Until now, the OS has been delivered as an optional update; while Windows Update gives it prominent positioning, it shouldn't be installed automatically. This system has already generated some complaints, as Windows Update will download the sizeable operating system installer even if you don't intend to upgrade any time soon, but, over the last couple of days, the situation seems to have become a little more aggressive. We've received a number of reports that people's systems are not merely downloading the installer but actually starting it up.
I have seen this first hand. They are doing it by making it an "optional" update that gets checked by default. And not only do they check it by default, they bring it back and check it again, even if you tell Windows Update to hide the update.
There's an interesting book on this subject called "Pandora's Seed: The Unforeseen Cost of Civilization" by Spencer Wells. Basically says that agriculture and its trappings (towns, etc) is a bad idea.
many of the chemicals contained in Aspirin
Say what? Aspirin contains only one chemical: acetylsalicylic acid. Nothing else.
It's not the number of decimal plaaces that's the issue. Mainframes can store and manipulate a number like 1.23 as EXACTLY 1.23, whereas a lesser machine would have to use some binary floating-point approximation (1.230000001234 or 1.229999999993241 for example) with rounding, etc. Even the programming languages used on mainframes (mainly COBOL and PL/I but also RPG) have specific provision for fixed-point decimal data types, whereas C and its derivatives (C++, C#, Java, Objective-C, D, etc) are utterly clueless.
But mainframe financial applications do relatively little actual arithmetic. Most of their time is spent moving strings and structures around - something that C and its derivatives also just can't do efficiently, if at all, whereas COBOL and PL/I do it easily and quickly.
In mainframe software, anything that can be static is static; data is only dynamic if it absolutely has to be. This is the basis for the high efficiency of mainframe software. COBOL has no equivalent of C's 'new'; PL/I does (of course - 'ALLOCATE') but it's used relatively rarely. You therefore almost NEVER see memory leaks in mainframe software.
The Glicko chess rating system and its successor Glicko2 (creative, huh?) are better than Elo and have been around for years. Various online chess sites use it, as does the Australian Chess Federation.
Credit ... is the only enduring testimonial to man's confidence in man. -- James Blish