That sounds like a complete hallucination to me. Please reconnect with the real world.

Always the time-honored classic. Of course, it hastens the demise of society, but who cares about minor details like that ...

Governments are generally not made up of people with real capabilities. And the voted-for parts are worse.

Well, it can be _done_. It would still not _work_. The problem is that this would preclude use of that monitor in a lot of scenarios _and_ the ads would either get stale or you would have to magic in some network interface for the monitor.

You obviously have given up. Not everybody has.

I see you have chosen to double down on the pathetic. Well, I guess this is all you can do.

Still pathetic. Try again?

Fortunately that does not actually work. I am sure they would love to do it though.

Guidelines that get reluctantly enforced only when things blow up are not worth anything.

"Literally required"? Such nonsense. Sane driver installation is just as subject to sysadmin consent as all other software installation. What do you think how this goes if somebody manages a supply-chain attach on this, especially on, say, an industrial control system that cannot simply be turned off?

Indeed. Insecure by design. In a rational world, this designed-in vulnerability would exclude Windows from most uses.

Clearly. This LG crap-show is just one more indicator, but the fundamental problem is all Microsoft.

Nope. The problem here is that YOU cannot read.

You do know that insults where the other side has strong proof they are not true do not work, right? Well, probably that is already beyond you. This is Kindergarten level though and not flattering for you. You may at least want to try to be a bit original, not completely dumb in your attempts to insult. This is just boring.

Ah, yes, the last defense of the mentally incapable: "Academics know nothing!". In actual reality it is almost always academics that brought an area to the level where it actually became possible to "do".