Export value from US is bigger than from Germany by about 15%. The biggest export is from China. It is abut 42% bigger than from US. If EU could be considered as a single country then it would have about 5% bigger export than China.
People will work for as long as they can to compete with their peers
Do you realize that the pears we are going to compete with are going to be machines in the far future when machines will be more intelligent than pure non-enhanced people. Either people will merge with machines or use genetic engineering heavily to improve themselves to be competitive. There is one other option: pure non-enhanced people will finish like horses did. A small percent of them will survive for the fun of the productive machines (something along the lines like horses are useful in horseracing now).
Universal basic income is possible but I think it is not the most probable option. Why would intelligent productive machines feed all the humans which are unable to compete. I think the most probable option is enhanced humans being able to compete with pure machines. Either by merging with them (cyborgs or mind upload to a machine) or by heavy genetic engineering of humans (wetware).
In fact only 8% of the EU's exports (by value) go to the UK.
This is probably more correct than 1/6 (16.7%) mentioned before. In 2013, UK imports represented 9.7% of the exports of all other EU countries.
An experienced glider pilot has one more vairometer to use - his own posterior. One can feel speed changes in it
Nope. As you say it, own own posterior is an accelerometer, measuring the speed changes, NOT a variiometer, measuring the speed i.e. the position change. You're one derivative wrong.
Right, one cannot integrate it in head for more than a second or few. I wanted to express it is good enough to detect where turbulent air region starts. And from the safety point of view, if you have enough height then it does not matter much whether you are raising or falling. The ground is still far away to have time to correct it before crashing. And near the ground you can even see it. It is important to know the speed so that one does not stall or cross Vne. But even if speed dial would break in some very unfortunate event
No idea why Bigelow screwed up. Gliders are built for turbulent weather. When one is targeting thermals then it is the turbulent parts of the atmosphere the plane is heading to. Stall speed is typically about 40 knots and Vne (top speed) is about 120 knots at low altitudes. The range is quite big. And it is not a big deal to get below the stall speed if you have enough height. You just lose part of that height. I experienced stall in a glider myself a few times. Not a big deal. On the other side crossing your Vne is almost as good as trying to kill yourself real hard. It is not easy to fly when your wings break off
Windows is becoming less and less relevant for gaming. Most people game on smartphones/tablets or consoles and SteamOS is gaining more support by the day.
As for as the number of players you are probably right. But most gaming revenue is still on PC: http://arstechnica.com/gaming/...
But the trend indicates the mobile platforms will eventually prevail.
Closed source, commercial software is written by people who are paid to do it. Software that people are paid to written more often includes the boring, not-fun parts like testing, documentation, and auditing. Therefore closed source software has a higher chance of being audited.
Why do you think a car company would not audit open source software it is using in their cars? They can get publicly ridiculed for low quality of their code. Would you buy a car from a company which was shown to have crappy and insecure code in their cars? This is not like a PC which you can reboot and all is fine. And why do you think a company which does not audit its open source code would audit its closed source code?
We're both just constructing arguments that may or may not be true. My point is that those arguments are irrelevant. A given piece of software either has or has not been audited.
I agree with you. My point is that in the case of a car software the openness of the source code would give the company even more incentives to audit it yourself compared to a closed source code. And moreover there are people who are really interested in cars and which would definitely look at the code. What about all the rodhoders?
I mean you want to move experience from simple PC software to car software. I do not think this is valid.
They're both wrong.
Open == You can audit it if you want. It's absolutely no guarantee that anyone ever has.
There may not be a guarantee but there is a good change it is statistically true. There exists a group of people who may want to audit a car software and they can do it only when it is open. Therefore open source software should have a higher chance of being audited.
Egotist: A person of low taste, more interested in himself than in me. -- Ambrose Bierce