A 4kWh per mile EV would cost $611.82/yr
The average large EV fuel economy is 4 _miles_ per kWh, but your math is correct. Except that you're comparing a large-ish SUV (Model Y) and the tiniest, most sluggish Camry. Model 3 RWD short range is 5 miles per kWh. Fuel price is also very volatile, and it's pushed down by the very EVs that benefit from its increase.
More importantly, the vehicle price itself is a big part of the savings. The US does NOT produce cheap EVs, but China does. E.g. Leapmotor A10 CUV is priced at $15k for the base model: https://moparinsiders.com/leap... Sure, it would be more expensive if produced in the US with the stronger safety standards and more expensive labor, but even at $25k it would blow any competition out of the water. The closest ICE car is something like Chevy Trax at $23k that has the 30mpg fuel economy. And EVs will get even cheaper as the battery R&D and capital expenses get paid back, ICE cars will not.
So yep. ICE cars are dead. The US just hasn't realized it yet.
If I'm driving a gas car then why should I have to subsidize anyone in my apartment let's driving an electric car?
I drive an EV. Why should I subsidize your gas car with oil industry tax incentives?
Also, it's a false dichotomy. Apartment buildings can install metered chargers and pay for them through user fees. At 2 cent per kWh surcharge, they'll pay themselves back in about 7-10 years.
China keeps wages artificially low through currency manipulation
That hasn't been true for the last 15 years.
The retraction note is all innuendo. It doesn't cure any actual wrongdoing, nor the actual basis of it's suspicions. just that "questions have been raised".
Meanwhile, studies that were quoted by grifters in the first true post-truth trial of Monsanto causing cancer were all ghostwritten by greenie hippies.
It's also not like it's the _only_ study of glyphosate safety. There have been 13 reliable mouse studies since 1984 ( https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/a... ), that found no effect on mice in any reasonable concentration. But now the anti-glyphosate grifters are going to glomp onto this study and pretend that nothing else exists.
Notice that it's Roundup *and its active ingredient glyphosate". But what else is in Roundup other than its active ingredient?
Surfactants. And you can buy pure glyphosate, actually. It's just not very convenient because it's an oily liquid that doesn't mix well with water.
BYD is heavily subsidized
No, it's not. The exported BYD cars do not get any unusual subsidies. Their initial R&D was subsidized, but not the production.
Which of course also conveniently earns them $$$ when there is significant data traffic from deployments in us-east-1 to deployments in other regions.
Except for us-east-2. Traffic between us-east-1 and us-east-2 costs the same as traffic within us-east-1.
Are there any completely non-toxic pesticides?
Glyphosate (plants are also pests).
Cursive is not generally less movement in the 2d plane of the paper
The problem is that the most-often taught English cursive style is bad. Spencerian cursive _is_ faster than block letters, because it allows you to smoothly move the pen. It's also slanted because slanted movements are faster than straight up/down lines.
Green energy requires oil based plastics and oil based chemicals
Not really. Plastics require hydrocarbons that can be sourced from anything, including coal or wood. Oil is just the most convenient source, but it's certainly not the only one.
And anyway, only 6% of oil is used for plastic production. Even increasing the demand for plastics won't materially affect oil consumption. Fossil hydrocarbons are also used as a feedstock for other industrial processes (fertilizer production mainly), but adding up all these uses accounts for just about 15% of global production.
"Those who will be able to conquer software will be able to conquer the world." -- Tadahiro Sekimoto, president, NEC Corp.