Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:If they're smart... (Score 2) 67

Yes, blame the blacks -- oh wait -- jews -- oh wait -- Russians for everything. It's literally impossible that Hillary might have lost because she ran an incompetent campaign while living in special bubble created by the press and her elite celebrity pals who told her that she didn't have to earn the election.

It's sort of ironic that you call Trump a xenophobe while the entire Democrat and press establishment go on a witchhunt for foreigners that makes Mccarthyism look like Mr. Rogers.

Comment Re:Not Surprising (Score 1) 262

Trump called on Russia to release illegally obtained information on Clinton during his campaign.

And that means what exactly? I thought it was pretty good rhetoric highlighting Clinton's carelessness with her email server.

Trump's policies are definitely pro-Russian.

No, they're just not anti-Russian. There is absolutely no reason for there to be hostility between the US and Russia, but Hillary was dead-set on war with Russia over Syria so her paymasters in Saudi Arabia and Qatar could get their pipeline instead of Putin's Iran pipeline.

It's at least a reasonable line of investigation.

Not really. It's the DNC and their media mouthpieces ("It's illegal to look at WikiLeaks!!!" -- CNN) desperate to distract from the content of the leaks, and a convenient way for the CIA to smear WikiLeaks with black propaganda. Lefties on Slashdot are gullible as hell. Before this Russia shit if the CIA said the sky is blue /.ers would have looked out of their basements to check and now it's all "HOW YOU DARE YOU QUESTION THE CIA!!!!"

Nothing has changed. The CIA didn't suddenly start telling the truth. WikiLeaks didn't suddenly start lying. Lefties on /. are just grasping at straws because they're assblasted about Trump and can't deal with losing.

Comment Re: Trump is worse (Score 1) 262

You realize that he paid the Clintons several hundred thousand dollars to be at his wedding, right, doesn't that make your little red blood boil?

No? Trump was a businessman buying favors from whore politicians.

You're going to be so mad when Trump Makes America Great Again and we add him to Mount Rushmore.

Comment Re:liar (Score 0) 508

Wikileaks has said they have stuff on the RNC.

But nothing at all salacious. Assange said everything they have on Trump is the same stuff he says publicly.

The US intelligence agencies have said they found evidence the RNC was also hacked.

This is /. We don't believe things US intelligence agencies say here.

Trump is careless and no doubt has given ample opportunity to collect incriminating material.

Trump doesn't use email, and there's no evidence he's engaged in anything criminal.

You're buttmad about Trump so all of a sudden the CIA is good guys who we can totally trust with no evidence and Wikileaks is evil Russian bad guys because the CIA says so. Trump Derangement Syndrome has knocked an awful lot of /.ers' tinfoil hats off, and they really need to get those glued back on.

Comment Re:Maybe he would return (Score 1) 508

prison system focused on rehabilitation

Because rehabilitation doesn't really work. The vast majority (like 85%) of people who have any contact with the justice system never again have contact with the justice system. Even a weekend in the drunk tank does it. They are scared fucking straight. So "rehabilitation" doesn't do anything for them...they don't need it. The other 15% are repeat offenders who are too stupid to engage in long term planning (we're talking IQs in the 70s and 80s here), so they go right back out and commit crimes because they are mentally incapable of thinking ahead to the consequences. So the best option is removal from society. Put them in jail where they can't hurt people. But you can't "rehabilitate" stupid.

Comment Re:WHat I said on ars: (Score 1) 508

Eh, the lefties on /. decided Assange is a bad man now that he exposed the corruption of the DNC and Hillary Clinton, allowing Trump to win the election. They loved Julian when he was exposing Bush era war crimes, but as soon as he exposed their corruption they got mad. So mad they're actually believing evidence-free claims from the CIA about scary Russian cyberhackers. Before this election those three letter agencies were four letter words on slashdot, but now if you don't with 100% certainty believe Putin personally hacked the entirety of time and space to elect Trump then oh my God who are you to doubt the conclusions of the US intelligence community?! I mean, would they lie to you?!

Used to be if the CIA said the sky was blue slashdotters would stick their heads out of the basement to check. But Trump Derangement Syndrome has got them believing anything the spooks jizz in their ears.

Comment Re:WHat I said on ars: (Score 0) 508

And what pray tell is Hillary going to be pardoned for?

Bribery. Selling political favors for donations to her foundation and speech money for Bill.

She's been investigated more than any candidate in US history, and if there was something to bring charges against her over, it would have happened by now.

You're begging the question that the only reason charges were not brought against her are because there's nothing to bring charges over. No, the reason charges are not brought is because politics, not because of innocence. There is an established pattern of companies and foreign governments who had business before Hillary's state department who gosh, never seemed all that interested in hearing any of Bill Clinton's speeches before, but suddenly felt like paying him 3x his going rate for some that fine, fine speechifyin'. And then as soon as the business was decided in their favor, they coincidentally never bothered to want to hear from Bill again. Oh and now that the Clintons are out of power the Clinton Global Initiative is shutting down. I wonder why? Wouldn't they have more time than ever for "charity work?"

That's enough to indict. You don't need a smoking gun, just a pattern of behavior. If you see a pattern of people pulled over for what would be a $100 speeding ticket who all get left off with a warning who then just happen to drive over to the police officer's daughter's girl scout cookie stand to buy $50 worth of cookies, I don't need a recording over the quid pro quo to indict for bribery/corruption, just the fact that pattern was followed enough times is plenty.

We have that pattern clearly established with the Clintons. And you can indict a ham sandwich. If this ham sandwich is not getting indicted, it's because someone is choosing not to indict. And you acknowledge this in your next sentence. If the Trump administration doesn't pursue her it won't be because she's sweet innocent Hillary who dindu nuffin: it'll be a political decision.

So we can absolutely keep with the Clinton Crime Syndicate rhetoric, because they are criminals, just like the Bush family is criminals, but they stay out of jail not because they're innocent but because the putrid, corrupt Washington political machine they're all part of won't jail them for fear of mutually assured destruction.

Comment Re:Explore the ocean depths (Score 1) 99

But even on DS9 you still had Sisko's dad's restaurant. With wait staff. How did Sisko's dad get the property for the restaurant? Why is anyone "doing what they love" busing tables? And on a daily basis to have a functioning restaurant? Again, people acting like they're participating in an economy. I don't know what a post scarcity society would look like, but it wouldn't look like Star Trek.

Getting to near light speed is probably feasible even with current technology. It doesn't need a lot of acceleration, just a constant one and you'll get there in a few years. It would take a lot of energy - but if you're fleeing for your species, who cares ? Use up all the stored energy earth has, why not - it will be worthless after you're gone.

Not a chance. Remember you don't just need energy you need reaction mass. Stuff to throw out the back of the ship (usually violently) in order to make it go forward. And when you're just starting out pushing the ship you have to accelerate all the reaction mass you'll need to get near light speed and then turn around and decelerate. The only hope for anything like what you're describing would be that EM drive thing, which is reactionless. Just add electricity and you apparently get thrust. We'll see if it works in a vacuum. I'm still thinking it's having a very, very tiny reaction with the earth's magnetic field and will not work in space away from a magnetic field, but we'll see. If that works, then yeah. Mine the moon for He3 for easier fusion reactors and you can carry all the energy you need to zip around the solar system and maybe even beyond without having to carry reaction mass.

But no, with today's proven, working technology any significant fraction of light speed is impossible. You can't carry enough reaction mass to accelerate and decelerate all your reaction mass.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Our vision is to speed up time, eventually eliminating it." -- Alex Schure