When I hear such an obvious corporate-speak falsehood, it only piques my curiosity/skepticism/cynicism further.

I have to think that a whole lot of executives have stuck their necks out to hop on the AI hype train, and having blown^H invested hundreds of billions of dollars, are now feeling the pressure to make that bet^H "investment" pay off. And since the market isn't organically willing to adopt AI enough to make a return on a TRILLION dollar investment, Google, Microsoft, etc have to force adoption via Gemini, Copilot, new Android versions, etc.

It's like Windows 11 all over again.

It's just stupid of Toyota that they didn't try to compete in EV sales. The idea that they would just let everyone else figure it out and then come from behind was a dumb one.

More than 75% of convicts doing forced labor are black

This is a direct lie.

Google's AI search results and their traditional search results may be presented at the same time on the same page, but they are not at all integrated. The AI search does not make use of the real search results, and the real search results do not make use of the AI search results either. There is absolutely zero integration there.

Chris Phillips, vice president for education at Google, is a lying piece of shit. No doubt that's why Google hired him — to tell lies like the piece of shit he is.

They don't, though. Routers need the most regulation because there is the most risk, though it's not really all that different from what TVs need.

(Nothing prevents a manufacturer from putting a microphone in a router.)

I trust China to sell the info they have on me to the feds, and I trust the feds to buy it.

A more pressing issue for the DoE is that Google is still using proscribed alternative terminology for SI.

No, what I do is hold people accountable for their actions.

If they vote without knowing what they're voting for then they are a massive fuckup AND they voted for those things, and fuck you for giving child rape supporters a pass for supporting child rape. You're as bad as they are. Worse, arguably, since you allegedly know what you're doing.

Nice vagueposting there.

You mean the PHP flap? There's plenty of places to get that fix.

You mean something else? Be specific.

https://www.tabletmag.com/sect...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://www.vox.com/2015/2/11/...

Not all of the humans will lose the ability to think.

Some will, however, think of how to do evil.

Right now we are destroying the biosphere so some men can live lives in excess of kings.

AI is probably best seen as part of that trend, because it is magnifying it.

The humans who can think are oppressing the ones that don't, keeping them from learning to think and solving these problems.

Whether they do that with AI or not only changes how rapidly it happens, and how rapidly the climate runs away to the point that it destroys all modern civilizations.

It probably won't make humans extinct... but it will make all prior mishaps for humanity look like a sunday picnic.

The question is, what happens when you try to maintain it? Is it even feasible or do you just have to do the job over again? And can the world sustain every job being done over and over again with AI?

So your plan is to solve this problem within 40 years?

That's not a thing. A part that cheap that becomes a sticking point will be reverse engineered and reproduced... By the Chinese in fact. It will show up on AliExpress with all the thousands of other parts like that

When you figure out how to get to the logical world, please LMK