I find your comment a difference without distinction. One does not address a problem with a monovariant. If we wish food to return to previous levels of nutrition, we address all of the reasons. If you are going to debunk, you debunk - not declare soil depletion as irrelevant. Now the next question becomes, will vegetables return to previous levels if we only return CO2 levels to 1750 ( the beginning of industrial era radiative forcing via increased CO2 in the atmosphere?

If you were to make a presentation on decreased levels of nutrients in food crops, and only use CO2 levels, there's your monovariant, and you will be taken to task for it. Don't like it? Use thoughts and prayers.

Both are exactly relevant.

Yes CO2 is definitely an issue in nutrient uptake. (I haven't finished the paper yet) So is soil depletion. This is not an either or situation as posters seem to be arguing.

Papers:

https://www.jacn.org/are-food-...

https://www.tandfonline.com/do...

General articles:

https://climate.sustainability... https://www.scientificamerican...

I take it you have the scientific papers debunking this? It is interesting the claim that no nutrients are removed from soils by growing things in them. Even if fertilizers are used, fertilizers do not have the identical characteristics of the entire soil composition in any area, they are there to provide for rapid growth, replacing some of the nutrients that end up in the veggies grown in those soils.

Now there is a relationship between Atmospheric CO2 percentage and growth. This probably contributes to the issue, but yeah - soil depletion can be a part of the nutrient uptake by veggies. Looking forward to your providing them - should be easy as you claim.

While we have people complaining about privatized profits and public losses, massive public money injection is the only way for nuclear fission to exist.

There is a reason that the Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act exists in the USA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...–Anderson_Nuclear_Industries_Indemnity_Act No private company can absorb the worst case damage a large nuc plant can cause if it goes Oopsies. And commercial insurance for such a thing will either put the insurance company or the business out of business.

Midi-chlorians! It's got what plants crave.

Yeah you're not going to convince people to care about addressing global warming by telling them they have to be poor (ie, give up their house, car etc).

It's kinda sad when you allow your enemy to live in your head rent free. Must suck to read a story about Belgium nuc plants than the only thing you can think of is posting anti-US hate. Frist Psot too - Your day is complete.

You're an idiot and you know it, otherwise you wouldn't have added the stipulation "open"

If you just want reasonable privilege escalation vulnerabilities, there are three mentioned in TFA. Three for free, don't have to pay a dime numb nuts.

That's how AWS does it.

If they have hacking skills, the "limited shell access" wouldn't be limited long. Giving someone local access is insecure.

In the Linux kernel (as with most kernels) privilege escalation exploits are a dime a dozen. You should not use shared machines as a form of security unless you trust everyone involved.

The reason is because the kernel/userland interface is huge and was not designed with security in mind (it was designed for efficiency, functionality, and sometimes outright braindeadedness). Even OpenBSD doesn't count local privilege escalation exploits, only remote exploits.

In Silicon Valley, the recent trend (for the past 15 years) is to find a programmer you can control, rather than a programmer who is good.

It certainly would - probably many people killed, NYC is a big city with a lot of people. But my experience with drones is that they need to be hitting on and synchronizing on all props.

Now just possibly, someone could program the software to cancel the side opposite to the one not working. But it better react really quickly. There's a saying in flying, always try to be three mistakes high.

If a car simply stops operating, you pull to the side of the road. and get out. If a drone has a prop malfunction, it becomes an uncontrolled rock.