Comment Re:hmm (Score 1) 197
stop objectifying women as "Birthing People" - don't deny it, the 2022 budget called women birthing people.
It's not a political talking point. It is a reality that some people who give birth will look exactly like men (when clothed, obviously). Are you interested in accuracy when laws and policies are written?
The problem you have here, is I am speaking of science, of which a DNA test will validate exactly what a person is. There are females, there are males and a very small number of intersex results. You are speaking of how a person dresses. SRSLY?
Here's the problem. First is of course the obvious objectification. An objectification that many women find extremely offensive.
Second, there is a huge problem with claiming you demand accuracy.
A "birthing person" is a Genetic female who can give birth to another person. That means that prepubescent, post menopausal, and sterile genetic females are by definition not "birthing persons". Aside from the obvious discomfort that involuntary sterile females might have in not living up to the objectification, you need to make up more terms for genetic females tho do not fit into the "Birthing person" term, otherwise, your accuracy claim is hypocritical.
In addition stop denying science and biology. Supporting biological men playing sports on biological women's athletic teams is part of this, and not only is batshit insane, but places women under the tyranny of men.
This is a red herring that was invented by the anti-trans movement to try to find an anti-trans cause they could rally people behind. Rules for sports at national, regional, and international levels have addressed issues of gender and sex and fairness for decades and decades, with no serious loss of opportunity or safety issues.
Give me the citations and names of men who have played on womens' competitive sports teams, for decades and decades.
Second, make no mistake - I 100 percent support people who want to "transition" to the other side, as long as they are adults.
Make no mistake, I do not support physically altering the sexual organs of people who cannot give consent to sex. The problem is that many young people are either confused about their sexuality, and change their minds. And transition of minors who might be confused, is definitely a rubicon. Once a person has their penis or breasts amputated, or vagina altered to place a mock penis, there is really no going back.
Stop supporting medical experiments on children. Look up Chloe Cole on Youtube. A supposed Trans, she was altered with injections that harmed her, and had her breasts amputated at 15. This is cruel Mengele' level experimentation. She eventually figured out she just had some issues going through puberty, and just like her biology, was a woman, but could no longer be a complete woman. She did testimony before congress. And she's not the only one who regrets transitioning
Okay, so now go ask those who wanted to transition but were bullied, attacked, etc. Oh, wait, you can't, because many of them are dead.
Surely you have the numbers of teens who committed juice specifically because they were "in the wrong body". Not those who ended themselves because of regular bullying.
Secondly, it is interesting that you do not care at all about teens who changed their mind. You have a specific list of people who are worthy of inclusion in your "care list" I do care about bullied schoolchildren. I also have a care for children who were mistakenly harmed by medical experimentation. You have made it clear you do not.
Finally, you are an example of not only why the Democrats lost the White House, your bigoted reaction. shows why if you retain teh power, Democrats will spend the proverbial 40 years in the desert.
In the end, it is a "tyranny of the weak" It is still a tyranny.