Comment Re:What does this actually do? (Score 1) 52
Somehow the lawyers will get the majority of the settlements.
Somehow the lawyers will get the majority of the settlements.
This is bad news if the Pixels are now eSIM only.
GrapheneOS only supports pixels and many of its users prefer a permissionless SIM.
Maybe they'll add support for some other device, perhaps one of the privacy phones.
...through fear-mongering and telling congress that people shouldn't have access to AI that OpenAI doesn't control.
ah, I will check out memory hole on some of my systems.
At least on 6.1 you have to be below 50% RAM usage too.
I found this in a RHEL doc that pointed to a kernel README that looked old af but said the same thing.
I have a few systems that run an app on solar during the day at 80% RAM and I had to stop the service before suspend to get it to work.
Yet it worked for a couple months in disk hibernate but then stopped and only memory sleep would work. On a Debian Bookworm stable kernel, so who the heck knows what broke (wasn't me!).
Battery usage overnight is different enough with many machines that I wish hibernate to disk worked reliably.
Anyway if I have 16GB RAM and a 36GB swap it seems bonkers to me that it is by design only working if less than 8GB of RAM is committed.
The subsystem is quite brittle and everybody seems to know.
Most package management systems require us to figure out which card we have, figure out which package supports it, and install that.
Really we wanted "install the package that supports my card".
Apparently this current problem highlights this disconnect when a package no longer does what it used to but the package system blindly updates it anyway.
Being 2025, surely somebody in the past 30 years has floated a meta package management system to handle this mapping? Or an apt plugin? Anybody here know that history?
I mean, we even have nvidia-detect for their cards to do the actual probing work.
Granted arch is rolling and rolling gonna roll, but we can have software that makes this work correctly.
I figured someone would bring up the myth of "the myth of talent". The art community is the absolute worst about this. To be good at art, you need both innate talent and practice. People who have that innate talent think that practice will get everyone there -- believe me, it doesn't. The reason you think it does is because of survivorship bias. Nobody asks me how I got to not be able to do anything art-wise except create copies of what I can see, so they don't ever find out that I practiced for decades and didn't get anywhere.
As it is, computers and programming are my skill, so I'm using that skill to generate art. Anybody who whines about me doing it that way is gatekeeping.
These sorts of theatrics exactly.
...not because it does.
It's all about gatekeeping the skill, time, and budget floor and propping up the wall between "producers" and "consumers". I worked hard to get where I am, therefore it shouldn't be made easier. I worked hard to make $20/hour, therefore we shouldn't raise the minimum wage. Etc.
The reason there aren't legions and legions of programmers protesting AI on twitter is because programmers are accustomed to change and we've learned to embrace it, yet every time there's a technology that changes how art is made (cameras, digital painting, 3d rendering, even pre-made pigments), there are a group of artists who flip their shit and say that the new technology is going to kill creativity and ruin art as we know it, then fifty years later all of the things that those people insisted are "not art" are in museums and art history books.
I hope a company in China gets ahold of the database and trains a good music generator AI on it and releases it for free.
Smart devices have been spying on you for years now. Don't buy a fridge that spies on you.
This guy either socially engineered his way through a line, analyzed a weakness in the line, or time-traveled from the '90's not realizing we've set up an incompetent but totalizing police-state control grid to interpose every tiny aspect of our lives.
To be fair, "pay on board" is less applicable to airplanes than trains because seatbelts are important in turbulence.
That said, the lack of capacity is widely acknowledged to be a feature of wildly incompetent management.
We just heard they've started a new project to rewrite the air traffic control system for the umpteenth time (and billions and billions later) to hopefully allow for more frequent landings and departures. I fear it won't be specified for AI-assist takeoffs and landings and will be obsolete before it's done.
Better make some more 8" floppies.
It's good to have a second engine but it sure sounds like Gecko isn't long for this world.
Speaking as an old graybeard UI guy.... we have just come up with more and more complex solutions to the same old internet "one weird trick" of putting your information on someone else's computer.
Yeah, I remember "Server Side Rendering"... we called Java Servlets or JSPs or PHP or ASP. There were clear divisions of labors and boundaries were respected.
Even when we had to go to make everything feel like an app, at least RESTful stuff still had those boundaries.
Now that everyone needs the same code running front and back, and JS (I'm not a hater of JS by any means but still) stuff like this is bound to have happened.
Do you live in a city?
It's so weird that when I was a kid the Left had "Save the Whales!!" bumper stickers and now it's the Right-Conservationists.
They even dedicated Star Trek IV to the cause.
Maybe if the whale killers get reinstated we'll at least get case law to prohibit permitting denials for Integral Fast Reactors and that can at least clean up the Boomers' nuclear waste to protect the ecosystem long term.
To downgrade the human mind is bad theology. - C. K. Chesterton