Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Someone is angry at the robots, (Score 1) 139

so he attacks the... wait for it.... the humans.

(removes eyeglasses and rubs eyes)

Are we sure that the robots are the problem here?

The attacker didn't express anger for robots. He expressed anger at the car's occupants for funding robots. But the problem isn't the robots or the human passengers; the problem is the attacker.

Comment Re:The NY Times ain't what it used to be (Score 1) 108

Bizarre journalism. The NY Times really isn't what it used to be.

It's not the newspaper or the journalists. They're just tailoring the writing style to appeal to the subscribers.

Fans of science fiction might recall "The Marching Morons", by C.M. Kornbluth (1951 short story) and "The Space Merchants" (1952 novel) by Frederik Pohl and C.M. Kornbluth. Both feature news stories written for idiots. That second one was an inspiration for the movie "Idiocracy". And "The Queer Story of Brownlow's Newspaper" (1932) by H.G. Wells describes a future newspaper that presents complex scientific news in a highly simplified, sensationalized, and colorful format for a society that has shifted its priorities away from traditional intellectual pursuits.

That has a familiar ring to it, no? Does our President speak the way he does because that's the only way he can express himself, or is he using language his base understands?

Comment Re:Seriously ...? (Score 1) 255

The lady that tried to run a law enforcement officer over in her SUV? Justified....this happens when a civilian in a car/truck refuses to get out and hits the accelerator and puts officers in jeopardy.

The officer put himself in jeopardy. ICE officers are trained to never approach a vehicle from the front and instead to approach in a “tactical" 90-degree angle to prevent injury or cross-fire. In other words, the officer disregarded DOJ guidelines by purposefully placing himself in front of the vehicle, then using that as an excuse to shoot and kill the driver. Oh well, she was a domestic terrorist and had to be put down.

Comment Re:Only adults (Score 1) 79

In most places you have an age condition to have an amateur radio license.

Most places? Can you cite a reliable source for that? I did some searching, and it seems that most countries don't have a minimum age requirement. Italy appears to have one (16); In Greece, it's 12. France and Netherlands used to have minimum age requirements but eliminated them. It looks like in most places, the only requirements are being able to read and being able to pass the technical exam.

Comment Re: fuck you. (Score 1) 151

Do you actually think it's "America Haters" Hegseth is interested in suppressing, or just Trump Haters?

I think he's too stupid to figure out who or why he's interested in suppressing. He just wants his boss to keep patting him on the ass. I mean, this guy purged references to the Enola Gay from DoD websites because he thought it was some kind of DEI reference.

As a friend of mine once said, "You can't make this stuff up."

Comment Re:Department of war lol (Score 1) 151

'police actions', 'nation building', 'kinetic actions', 'troop surges', 'anti-insurgencies' endless euphemisms all because it is some how more palatable than admitting we are/were engaged in warfare

The defense company I work for likes to say, "We support the warfighters!" I guess that rolls of the tongue more smoothly than "We support the kinetic actioners!"

Comment Re:What a headline (Score 1) 54

Let's not get caught up in the word-salad headline debate and focus on the real issue.

Let me see - did I ask the Slashdot crowd for a list of topics acceptable to discuss? Hmm, nope. Thanks anyway for your unsolicited advice.

Our government, is spending our tax dollars, to find bugs in our software, and not telling us about those bugs that could be exploited and leave us vulnerable. The US government should not be allowed to silently exploit consumer or commercial software....There should be a law requiring disclosure from government entities...

About 90% of the bugs are disclosed; the other 10% remain undisclosed for some period of time while various defense and intelligence agencies use them for "cyber warfare" activities. The larger problem is not bugs that are not disclosed; it's that many of the bugs that ARE disclosed go unaddressed by the software vendors. Maybe the law you're looking for should be to require companies to notify their customers and patch the vulnerabilities within a reasonable period of time.

How do you suppose vulnerabilities find their way onto the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) list? The CVE is maintained by the MITRE Corporation under the oversight of U.S. CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency). The National Vulnerability Database, maintained by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) - another government agency - supports the CVE with analyses. Trenchant, the employer of the guy who stole and sold the exploits, develops "zero-day" exploits for intelligence and defense customers. You know, like the tools that were used to hack Iranian nuclear research and production facilities. There is little doubt that adversaries (and most likely allies as well) of the US are developing similar tools.

Comment Re:Real question (Score 1) 341

Old people who ignore climate change don't do that because they're old; they do it for the same reasons young people ignore climate change:

  1. 1. They're ignorant.
  2. 2. They don't believe human activity is a major contributor (see #1).
  3. 3. Their creature comforts are more important to them (see #1).
  4. 4. They trust the President more than the science (see #1).

No doubt there are other reasons, but chances are they all trace back to #1 above.

Comment Re:I approve (Score 1) 124

If you go to the Download ALL area ... then they list ALL their versions since the beginning of Mint. It is just a reference archive.

Actually, they only list all of the currently supported versions, like it says in large italics on the page you linked. A complete list of all versions going back to 1.0 would be huge and pointless. What practical use is there for a Linux installation that doesn't have access to a single update to the original release, unless you're a masochist who revels in unpatched bugs and security holes? But if you seriously want them, try here.

Slashdot Top Deals

Science may someday discover what faith has always known.

Working...