Comment Re:I'll make a deal with you (Score 1) 178
Yes I mistyped, nuclear causes far fewer deaths overall.
Yes I mistyped, nuclear causes far fewer deaths overall.
Notepad++ does this, it's pretty nice.
Just as a reminder to everyone; nuclear causes around 1-2 orders of magnitude more deaths per produced terawatt-hour of energy than the usual fossil fuel suspects (oil, coal, natural gas), and this does not exclude large-scale nuclear accidents (or in the case of Chernobyl, a downright disaster). I'd live next to a nuclear power plant every time than a coal power plant.
Now if a country has to choose between nuclear and staying on fossile, then the choice should be nuclear every time. Eventually we may have the available technology to phase out both, but at the moment this is not feasible. Renewables are cheap, clean and available in volume, but they are not stable in output levels. Only we can store enough energy in various forms, then we could switch to 100% renewable. We are not there yet and are not likely to get their in the mid-term.
No it's not, if you are paying for the service then it's not copyright infringement. However you are very likely breaching the terms and conditions of the streaming provider, and that might get you banned or similar.
At least in the EU, consumer protection is strong enough that an EV battery only lasting 5 years (or only up to a certain mileage) would be considered a faulty product even if the warranty doesn't cover it.
Fusion power is well-defined though. General intelligence isn't, we don't have an objective measurement by which we could say if something is generally intelligent or not, and if it's not, how far off it might be. The only thing we really have is the automatic assumption that we ourselves have to be generally intelligent because our ego demands it.
It's a buzzword for sure, but there is no denying that AI has, even before it became the latest buzzwords, been used in scientific research to great effect, distilling raw data into information that can be used for breakthroughs.
By $100 billion you mean $69 billion, out of which $31 billion is old stuff from stockpiles, some of which was already phased out, waiting to be scrapped (e.g. M113)?
This is about the UK which is no longer in the EU.
But no way on the second, the "and Russians know that". Russians really do think this is a clash between western and their civilisation, that this is a fight for survival and all that. They're convinced that if they loose the war the west won't just agree to let them off the hook, but they'll want a puppet west-controlled government installed that'll basically allow the western financial class to plunder apart the country. And frankly, I don't see any different realistic scenario either.
That's what the state propaganda in Russia says. But independent polling shows that the majority of the Russians just wanted the war to end already in 2024. I guess it's still officially a special military operation, but I don't think they are locking up people just for calling it a war anymore.
Russia also capitulated in WW1 after it started to fall apart due to the war by the way.
Russia has invaded Ukraine, there is no need for them to fight to the bitter end. All they need to do is to withdraw to end the war, and the Russian people know that.
Germany capitulated in WW1 because they could no longer afford to feed their people despite that, apart from the very opening weeks of 1914, no part of the war had been fought on German soil. Bombing was minimal at that point in time due to the primitive technology, but the blockade had ruined their economy and produced severe food shortages on the home front.
This is why Hitler was so adamant that Germany needed to take Ukraine before Moscow in 1941, to ensure they got access to enough food.
I think you are delusional if you think that the USA had anything to do with whether Ukraine decided to fight for their independence and freedom or not. Ukraine fights because they do not want to become Russians.
The "never had a chance" shtick is also fairly hollow at this point when Russia's economy is at the point where only the war is keeping it afloat.
Russia's industrial growth has stopped, but the military industry is still growing meaning it's cannibalizing the civilian industry and it still can't keep up with the Russian losses. Meanwhile the Russian war chest (also called the Russian National Wealth Fund) has shrunk to a third of what it was, and the Russian state budget which assumes an oil price of $75 per barrel is looking at a budget crisis with the currently looming threat of a $50 per barrel price. Russian banks are in a very poor state.
If the war ends soon, there are some very serious economic shocks about to happen. And if if stretches out further, the Russian civilian economy might collapse under the weight of the demands of the war economy.
It makes sense for the EU to counter goods tariffs with what would essentially be the equivalent of services tariffs.
Yes I mean the obvious next step is for the US to put 100% tariffs on everything, then proceed to order massive amount of goods from around the world and hand it out to US citizens for free. Since for every dollar spent, the US would get a dollar from a foreign government, this is basically an endless free stuff machine.
Then if every other country does the same thing, no-one has to work anymore because everything is free! And here Star Trek thought we needed replicators to achieve this.
The list of Trump's real achievements is rather short, but at least he proved that the deep state doesn't really exist, because there is no way they would have let him do everything he has done if they really held all the power.
"Don't discount flying pigs before you have good air defense." -- jvh@clinet.FI