Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Isn't this called (Score 1) 113

Usually it's still the government taking control over businesses in fascism, but not in the socialist way of changing the internal structure of any companies and how they operate. Instead you get the businessmen to join the leading political party and toe the line, or you throw them in jail (or kill them) and hand over their business to a party member (e.g. Hermann Göring).

What blurs the line is that the fascists usually gets some of big business on board with this before they even get into power and start this process (e.g. Trump's inauguration).

Comment Re:Tech sovereignty is a survival need. Good on 'e (Score 2) 205

Ah that old chestnut. Yes, European NATO countries have long benefited from being backed by US military guarantees. But this was in no way something the US were against. After the cold war, the US were encouraging a move away from national defence and instead towards European NATO members specializing their military for a few specific tasks. This was optimization for supporting the US military in a post-cold war world. The US didn't want a strong Europe, they wanted a Europe dependent on the US:

Now there has been a change, and while it will take years to build up European independent security, the process is ongoing and Trump has ensured it is not going to stop.

We have already started to hear whining from the US about getting exactly what they ordered when European NATO is investing more and more into European-made weapons instead of buying American. Maybe we are not so many years away from export restrictions on some high-tech weapons from the EU to the US, just like the US does not sell it's best weapons to NATO allies.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Little prigs and three-quarter madmen may have the conceit that the laws of nature are constantly broken for their sakes." -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Working...