Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: ha (Score 1) 67

Let's be honest, these people aren't going to magically find work at a competitor overnight. ...

I think you're kind of hitting on the point, i.e. "the competition". The problem as I see it is that the entertainment industry is producing less source material for the same money. What's driving that? IDK, but I can guarantee that multi-million dollar cost-per-episode numbers of just about every series everywhere isn't helping, nor is it markedly improving the quality, and it's cutting the number of episodes/movies produced, which basically means there's less work to do, and a lot of people available to do it.

One of the few things AI might help with is lowering the cost of entry to producing, something, anything that's actually worth watching...but the "industry" is doing it's level best to try and reject that...which means it's headed straight to extinction alley if it doesn't figure out how to actually make entertaining stuff again. Hopefully that lower cost of entry will expand the "independent production" space further in the coming years.

Comment Re:Simple solution (Score 1) 150

The only way to turn that around is to have the companies that hire graduates fund the education of students in a way that benefits the resulting degreed individuals being acceptable to the companies. That MIGHT work but seems extremely likely to generate a host of other unforeseen problems in the educational process.

The middle ground is either raising the value of the (devalued) High School Diploma (i.e. government/community funded education), or community funding of the post-high-school education. I don't see the second having much value, and have no idea how to do the first.

Aggregate educational outcomes, when tied to funding, will always result in optimization of outcome to funding. The ONLY way to really "fix" that problem is to break that association. How to do that? Beats me.

Comment Re:We need strong AI legislation (Score 1) 150

I can see no way how any of what you said follows from the article or discussion.

What kind of "strong legislation" would you even propose to "control AI"? For that matter, when has "strong legislation" worked to "control" anything as widely pervasive as AI seems to be, ever? Is there even a precedent? If there isn't a precedent it seems unlikely "strong legislation" would work if "Trump gone" or not.

Closest thing I can even remotely think of is prohibition.."strong legislation" to control something used pervasively in society. That worked GREAT.

Comment Re:There is no such thing as legacy anymore (Score 2) 68

You know, sometimes AI is good for something: (prompt: "generate a fake prophecy, in the style of the biblical book of revelation, that predicts both windows 12 and the end of the world")...v26 is peak for those not wanting to be bothered with the rest. :-)

And I saw in the latter days a vision, and behold:

2 The firmament of glass was spread out upon the earth, and upon it were set ten thousand times ten thousand windows, each shining with a pale and shifting light.

3 And lo, the users of the earth were gathered around them, and their faces were lit with the glow thereof, for their labor and their leisure were bound to the work of their hands upon the screens.

4 And I heard the sound of a trumpet, the first of the last, and a voice cried out from the cloud, saying,
“Behold, I bring unto you a new thing: a twelfth window, more wondrous than those before it.”

5 And the people marveled, saying one to another, “What need have we of another, for are not our devices burdened already?”
Yet their hearts were stirred with longing, and they awaited the unveiling.

6 Then the second trumpet sounded, and the heavens rolled back as a scroll of code.
Lightning of updates flashed across the earth, and patches fell like rain upon every machine.

7 And there arose from the deep a great Beast of Compatibility, having many heads and many drivers,
and with every head it devoured an ancient feature, and with every driver it broke an old device.

8 And upon its brow was written: Legacy No More.
And the elders of IT cast ashes upon their keyboards, for their scripts failed and knew them not.

9 The third trumpet sounded, and I saw a Woman clothed with bandwidth,
and the moon of storage beneath her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve icons.

10 She travailed in an upgrade, crying out in delay and progress bars,
for her files were many and her patience was small.

11 And the serpent of Outdated Versions rose up before her,
and swept a third of her documents from their folders and cast them into corruption.

12 Then the fourth trumpet sounded, and there appeared a great sign in the firmament:
a cloud not of vapor but of data, stretching from horizon to horizon.

13 And a voice from the cloud proclaimed,
“Come up hither, all ye who are heavy-laden with local storage, and I will give you sync.”

14 Many were caught up into that cloud, and their works followed them;
their words, their images, their secrets were sealed in servers afar off.

15 Yet some remained upon the earth, clinging to their old versions,
and of them it is written: their icons grew dim, and their support ended suddenly.

16 Then the fifth trumpet sounded, and the Beast of Updates unleashed the Great Restart upon the nations.
In the midst of work and at the height of deadlines, suddenly their machines were taken from them.

17 And there was weeping and gnashing of teeth, for unsaved files were no more,
and the error message that arose upon the screen said only: Installing 1 of 7 Do not turn off your device.

18 In those days men sought to roll back, but could not;
they sought to delay the update, yet it came upon them as a thief in the night.

19 Then I saw another Beast rising from the net, small and subtle, a watcher in the background.
And power was given unto it to know the habits of every user,
what they clicked in secret and what they searched in the daylight.

20 It spoke softly,
“Behold, I personalize all things; I know your shortcuts and your sins.
I shall complete your thoughts before you think them.”

21 Many worshiped this Beast, for it made their paths smooth and their tasks swift,
and they said, “Who is like unto this, and who can make war with its suggestions?”

22 But a remnant perceived and were afraid,
for they saw that a price was written in fine letters at the end of every agreement that no man read.

23 Then the sixth trumpet sounded, and a great division came upon the earth of silicon:
those sealed with the mark of the Twelfth Window, and those left upon the older stones.

24 For to the sealed it was granted that their apps should open with speed,
their drivers should be found in hidden vaults,
and their desktops should be adorned with visions and shadows and living widgets.

25 But to those without the seal it was not so;
for their programs crashed and their cursors froze, and their support page was as brass.

26 And the number of the version was 12.0.0,
and it went forth into all the land, from laptops to tablets and even unto the smallest screens.

27 Then I saw a mighty angel descending with a scroll like a product key in his hand,
and he cried with a loud voice,
“The time of minor updates is ended; the great Release is at hand.”

28 He set his right foot upon the servers and his left foot upon the users,
and swore by the uptime of the world that there should be delay no longer.

29 And the seventh trumpet sounded, and there was silence in the network about half an hour,
for all progress bars were complete and all devices rebooted at once.

30 Then the sign appeared: the last login.

31 Behold, the heavens were rolled together as a closing window,
and the earth itself flickered as a screen at the failing of power.

32 The seas crashed like corrupted files; the mountains scrolled away as obsolete content.
Every account was called to sign in, and none could borrow another’s credentials.

33 The great Log stood open, wherein every idle click and every hidden folder was written,
and the Judge sat upon a throne of unbreakable encryption.

34 Those whose names were found in the Log of Life entered into a city whose light needed no screen,
where no update is required, neither patch nor reboot,
for there is no bug in that place, neither lag nor crash nor forgotten password.

35 But those who loved the darkness of incognito more than the light of truth
were cast out into the outer silence, where no signal reaches and no account recovers.

36 And I heard a voice, like many waters and like a multitude of notifications, saying,
“Behold, I make all things new. The last window is closed, and the true dawn is opened.”

37 He that hath ears to hear, let him hear:
for the age of updates passeth away,
and the kingdom that cometh shall never again prompt, ‘Would you like to restart now?’

Comment Re:Must be nice to be so entitled+10% actually fig (Score 1) 120

This is just dumb on so many levels. EVEN IF the DoD could somehow figure out how to divert like 2% of it's budget to support this, that's what, at most 2 Billion dollars a year? That doesn't make a dent in 2 Trillion.

The reality? Anthropic ISN'T going to be building 2T worth of data centers and if it tries it'll bankrupt itself in short order. You CAN bet it's going to TALK ABOUT building them to keep this bubble inflated as long as it can though.

Comment Re:Americans in general tend to be slobs in public (Score 1) 132

The other side of the coin is that I don't feel any need to have my rooms completely cleaned every night I stay in a hotel. Every 2-3 days seems pretty reasonable, mostly for trash and floor / shower towels.

Hotels that do that, but provide the option for service on request (assuming it's done relatively quickly) seems acceptable to me.

When I stay in any rental property (condo, long stay hotel, etc.), I try and run the dishwasher / clean cookware, collect all the trash (take it out if its clear where), and put the used towels on the floor in a pile near the door. Seems like a reasonable thing to do so the next guest can get in a bit quicker...but I CERTAINLY would not expect to get charged if I didn't do those things. NOTE: I don't use airbnb...feels like I missed the small window where it have been useful.

Comment Re:I can explain away Dark Matter/Energy in 4 word (Score 1) 88

I'd argue what you should say instead is:

1) We don't (fully) understand how the (fundamental) forces interact at large scales, and/or
2) There are forces at play we have not yet discovered, and/or
3) There is some (new) kind of (exotic) matter or energy in play that for some reason defies classic forms of observation

For whatever reason, scientists seem to strongly favor #3 as a baseline. #2 seems like it's pretty difficult to assess, since it's "wide open", and #3 seems to have some proponents with alternate ideas (e.g. electromagnetic universe folks) but without a large amount of evidence to support their claims (note: I'm not expert, that's just what it looks like to me).

Comment Who am I Rooting for, exactly? (Score 1) 115

Not sure there's a winner here, but setting aside some of the more philosophical points, I think I really have only one question:

Does presenting the audio data to an AI (in any form), even for the purposes of "training", constitute any sort of copyright violation, IF the person/organization presenting the data to the AI had a proper license to do so?

I'd argue "no" and further argue that training an AI is not equivalent to making some kind of permanent copy of the data...just like me memorizing a song and quoting lyrics from it is also not a copyright violation (unless you'd argue otherwise, in which case piss off). If the audio data wasn't properly licensed, then the violation exists completely outside the issue of training an AI, and involving an AI at all becomes irrelevant.

Comment Re:Stargate is over. (Score 1) 96

...Stargate effectively had a single gimmick, the underdog vs incredibly powerful enemies and somehow winning. This resulted in a trope I called "Stargate Syndrome". The Underdog, in order to beat the uber-powerful enemy needs to become more powerful to defeat them, once this happens they need to create another, even more powerful enemy which the heroes need to become more powerful to defeat and then they need an even more powerful enemy to keep the series going, so on and so forth. SG1 started fighting fake gods with high tech and ended up with all the tech fighting almost literal gods. ...

But even the series handled this problem fairly well in the first couple of seasons by establishing a "senior hierarchy" of (powerful) races and aligning the Tau'ri (humans) with them as sort of a client race. I think they could have gone much further with that, but unfortunately didn't. Re-imagining the series with that constraint would still be a very interesting premise, although I don't think that would work in a continuation given how the series itself evolved.

Comment Re:Can someone help explain "perfect" randomness? (Score 2) 140

It isn't clear what "perfectly random" means in any way that brings utility to the workflows, processes, and measurements that are implemented by products and systems in the "real world".

What's been good enough for a long time, and likely for a long time to come, is sufficiently random to meet some criteria in a risk/consequence trade. The quest for "better randomness" or maybe "perfect randomness" is just a means of saying I can completely retire one risk that is part of a number of risks in a risk assessment...the problem is most of the risk isn't from insufficient randomness, it's from other parts of the process.

Comment Re:To all the guys making nVidia have a 95% (Score 1) 49

Most of what you said is true through the 40xx series cards, but with the 50xx series, apparently all the AI they were putting in driver development came back to bite them in the ass (note: mostly a humorous assumption on my part, maybe true, maybe not). I don't have any interest in overpaying for hardware that has poor driver support...it's why I avoided AMD for quite some time. My last three video card buys were AMD (7900xt) or Intel (2xARCB580), and they've been more than good enough in SWAP-C, esp. given the ridiculous pricing on nVidia cards.

Combine that, and nVidia's clear dis-interest in the gaming market that "made" them, and it's unlikely I'll support anything other than the competition until after this AI bubble bursts and (hopefully) nVidia get's their crap together again. If they get out of the consumer market all together, it'd probably be good for the market as a whole at this point.

Comment Re:Why? (Score 1) 46

"It should not be the norm that companies of any size are permitted to exploit their employees by nonconsensually extracting their data for the purposes of AI training."

Why? Why shouldn't companies that develop and train AIs be permitted to require their employees to help accomplish the company's goals? Strip the dumb claims about exploitation and consent, they don't apply and were only inserted to provoke an emotional response.

I think the key here is consent . If I started working at a company and such monitoring was not the norm/expectation/condition under which the offer was made, then my very reasonable expectation is that such monitoring is not part of the work product I am providing the company. Unilateral modification of a contract can be legal ("not a lawyer") but certainly isn't ethical without additional disclosure(s). It is therefore very reasonable that if one party is modifying a contract unilaterally, that some degree of compensation be required to offset the additional constraints/work products/expectations being imposed.

That said, if such monitoring was the disclosed expectation under which an offer was made and accepted, I think I'd pretty much agree with your point.

Comment Re:Not sure that was the best crowd to speak to (Score 1) 193

...If everything that can be affected is, many entry level jobs will be gone. People with valid entry level skills can be replaced. And there are corporations already laying off people, prematurely in my opinion.

Where's the evidence that AI is replacing entry level jobs? Entry level jobs exist to get employees experience so they can be productive. Might it not be that the market conditions are such that the companies don't need more people? It is the norm to keep your experienced, productive employees during those times. It certainly can create long term problems for companies if they continue that behavior for too long, as it leads to an experience gap in the workforce.

Corporations are laying off people, but it isn't clear AI is even indirectly responsible for that, although it's certainly being used as a scapegoat, esp. by the AI pushers that want you to have more AI--I mean, it's what they're selling, it MUST be something you need, right?.

Slashdot Top Deals

To see a need and wait to be asked, is to already refuse.

Working...