Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment To be taken with at least one pillar of salt (Score 1) 44

I'm all for showing progress but at the same time I don't like what amounts to PR fluff to generate false-hope. Slashdot Editors, please title things with the appropriate skepticism and don't give into the temptation to click-bate or take pharma news-release info at face value.

Readers and followers of science subjects have long become tired of the "WE GOT IT GUYS"->"Oh shit it didn't work" treadmill so please post things with **definite** and **verifiable** i.e. ***reproduced*** results.

Also, given the notes by the editors on the paper amyloid beta theory and potential fabricated results of some fundamental research see: https://www.nature.com/article...

Please tread carefully and point out PR for what it is.

Slashdot Top Deals

"An open mind has but one disadvantage: it collects dirt." -- a saying at RPI

Working...