Comment To be taken with at least one pillar of salt (Score 1) 44
I'm all for showing progress but at the same time I don't like what amounts to PR fluff to generate false-hope. Slashdot Editors, please title things with the appropriate skepticism and don't give into the temptation to click-bate or take pharma news-release info at face value.
Readers and followers of science subjects have long become tired of the "WE GOT IT GUYS"->"Oh shit it didn't work" treadmill so please post things with **definite** and **verifiable** i.e. ***reproduced*** results.
Also, given the notes by the editors on the paper amyloid beta theory and potential fabricated results of some fundamental research see: https://www.nature.com/article...
Please tread carefully and point out PR for what it is.