Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Process Patents (Score 1) 45

Independent of the sleazy nature of the glass, process patents have gotten out of hand and need to be reigned in. People have made highlight reels for years, this is just an automation tool that certainly could be protected rationally by copyright without a claim to have invented automating highlight reels. I mean, AI could already do it with the right prompt and training.

Comment Re:What?? Must be switched off immediately! (Score 2, Insightful) 10

I mean, this could be used to see things about the non-existent climate change, right? It must be banned! Or maybe put 100% tariffs on every byte of data!

Yes, you must inject one byte for every byte you take; can't let you get away with science. Maybe Congress should make it illegal to take publicly available information and use it for scientific purposes.

Since researchers used publicly available orbital information from Starlink satellites , I wonder how long it will be before Musk wants to get paid for the data.

Comment Not a big deal to me (Score 2) 248

Freshman year is an acclimation and get you non-core stuff out of the way. Taking them out means the easy A's don't inflate your grade point so your reported GPA is mr indicative of your actual major performance. Personally, when I interview I really didn't care about GPA. You got in to a school where we hire, you made it through and graduated; I always thought using them was just a way for a company to say "We hired the brightest." I was more interested in what you did during school, what you were interested in; a few tech questions sorted out what you know.

Years ago, when I got my grad degree, one company wanted to know your undergrad GPA as well. For fuck sake, I got into a school you obviously hire a lot of people from, I graduated , and my undergrad was over a decade ago. Needless to say, I didn't accept their offer to interview; I suspect with my initial reaction to their request it would not have gone well.

The real problem is grade inflation, which makes GA even less important.

Comment Re:Translated from History. (Score 1) 44

"More than $8 trillion of capital is expected to be invested, a staggering sum. We see an enormous opportunity for private capital to finance a portion of this along with public capital."

Translated: “We’ll get all the upside and foist the downside on public investors. “

What exactly is the "public capital" they speak of here? Are they offering pre-build IPOs or some equally delusional investment "opportunity" while pretending vaporware could never dot-bomb again? History is a bit curious if we're still that dumb, or if we've become even dumber.

"No one in this world, so far as I know... has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people." H L Mencken

Comment Translated from WallSpeak (Score 5, Insightful) 44

"More than $8 trillion of capital is expected to be invested, a staggering sum. We see an enormous opportunity for private capital to finance a portion of this along with public capital."

Translated: “We’ll get all the upside and foist the downside on public investors. “

Comment Re:Cheapass hardware and poor software design (Score 1) 111

At a minimum, it would seem Flock should validate the tag is in fact a valid tag for state X and the vehicle matches the state's description.

The summary describes cases of looking for a "stolen plate", where a plate is transferred from one vehicle to another to obscure the identity of the owner. Even for stolen vehicles, the plates may get swapped, so you often do want to pull over a vehicle when the description doesn't match the plate.

Yea, that's a challenge. At a minimum, Flock should do a fuzzy search on the tag with the state registry to see if a missed read digit results in an hit, but that would mean more work and cost more money. Flock's real problem seems to be GIGO compounded by poor programming logic.

Comment Re:Cheapass hardware and poor software design (Score 2) 111

How would Flock know which state to which the license belongs? I would think if it has troubles reading the numbers, which are usually large compared to the rest of the stuff on the plate, it would have troubles reading the state as well.

They have to have a way, or else there whole system is even more fucked up. States can and do duplicate tags, so a simple number search could cause problems. I suspect the whole state reading is fucked, because of the large variation in how states put the name on a tag, the wide variety of tag graphics even within states, etc.

Comment Re:Cheapass hardware and poor software design (Score 2) 111

Image recognition can perfectly distinct between an E and F as long as the picture is good. Now Flock crapware is working with low quality images and told to decide whether it is an E or F without the option to admit it might be either of them.

At a minimum, it would seem Flock should validate the tag is in fact a valid tag for state X and the vehicle matches the state's description. That would at least throw out bad reads , assume Flock wouldn't just flag it as an invalid tag so it would still generate a hit in the DB.

Comment Re:U.S. license plate design is quite bad. (Score 1) 111

The UK have also removed certain characters from [A-Z] [0-9] from our numberplates as they can be too easily confused. So for example you cannot confuse a 1 and I if your numberplates simply don't have I's in them. Same for 8 and B. O and 0 etc. It does reduce the number of possible plates you can produce but with six digits in the plates there are hundreds of millions of possibilities.

IMHO I would also be an idea to include a check character, that would virtually eliminate mistakes in a stroke going forward.

US plates are the same, which is why vanity plates are often a mix of numbers and letters.

Comment Re:96% (Score 1) 111

>cameras accurately read more than 96% of license plate characters people in general don't appreciate what 96% means... that's 4 out of 100 wrong that's 1 out of 25 wrong for a typical licence plate with like 8 chars, that's 1 licence plate in 4 wrong. it's not one in a million.

More to the point, if say 96% of the plates are valid and not tied to a crime, a positive hit has a 50/50 chance of being a false positive. When looking at percentages like that, it's important to understand the population of true positives and false positives to understand the real odds of a false positive when yo have a positive result.

Comment Smaller, on device models are the future (Score 4, Insightful) 26

Most tasks don't really need the big cloud based models. While on device models will lack the depth, breadth, and speed of cloud offerings, they have a number of advantages:

  • Private data can stay private and not get into the cloud models knowledge.
  • For specific types of tasks with well defined needs, the smaller models will be good enough
  • Costs are a lot less and more controllable since you aren't buying tokens at an unknown rate
  • Cloud models can still be accessed if needed via an API while still not revealing private data; for example you could use the cloud to do a lit search and use the data locally
  • They can be hosted on a private server or on the end user's machine
  • Speed isn't necessarily a big issue for many tasks vs costs; and speed can be bought

Of course, if the silicon gets powerful enough to make local models more commonplace, the AI firms may be more reticent to release stripped down versions for free when they discover it's no longer the first hit is free model...

Slashdot Top Deals

There is no likelihood man can ever tap the power of the atom. -- Robert Millikan, Nobel Prize in Physics, 1923

Working...