Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment A problem with 'automated' ticketting systems (Score 1) 351

One potential problem I see arising from automated ticketting systems, is the problem of the driver getting a ticket, but no notification that they were in violation, so you could potentially ticket the same driver over and over with the driver not even realising they are being ticketted.

Here in the U.S., my family is from the State of Ohio. Now, in Ohio, there is a 'point system' with regards to drivers licenses. Different infractions are assigned different amounts of points - worse infractions get more points, a very minor infraction might get 1 point. When you hit some threshold amount of points, your driver's license is automatically suspended.

My family was on a trip once, and my father was driving. He flowed along with the other traffic on the road, not going faster than the other drivers, but not slower. We were travelling in another State, Illinois. Someone, later that day or weekend, told my dad how in Illinois, they use automatic cameras to enforce the speed limit and automatically ticket you. My father was worried that there were a few constuction zones we had passed through (maybe 4 or 5 of them as we crossed the State), and he got really worried that he was going to get 5 or 6 tickets for that one trip. Luckily, Illinois apparently either wasn't using cameras in all the zones, or maybe they just set them at a threshold significantly above the speed limit (say > 15mph over the limit), but whatever the case, my dad didn't end up getting a whole bunch of tickets.

My point in all this, though, is that if you have automatic systems that ticket people, but you don't notify them that they are in violation, they aren't probably going to *stop* violating - they'll keep on speeding, and potentially end up getting lots of tickets for what was, sort of, a single violation, and they might end up losing licenses.

If many thousands (millions?) of drivers suddenly started to lose their license because of these automatic ticketting systems, there's gonna be a huge public outcry, I would expect.

Comment Re:Breaking up companies (Score 1) 372

I would guess that the separation would be between adsense and everything else resulting in google selling space on its pages to adsense to use. This would make it more certain that the search results weren't being affected by the advertisements. (which seems to be the allegation)

Australia

Anti-Gamer South Australian Attorney General Quits 104

dogbolter writes "South Australian Attorney General, Michael Atkinson, infamous for the banning of R18+ rated games and the censoring of political comment in Australia, has quit. The recent South Australian election provided a massive swing against Atkinson's governing labor party. As a direct result of the South Australian election result, he is standing down. Hopefully someone with half a clue will assume the vacant post and overturn the decision to ban adult oriented computer games."
The Almighty Buck

How Do You Measure a Game's Worth? 188

RamblingJosh writes "Video games can be very expensive these days, especially with so many great games on the horizon. So I wonder: how exactly do you get the most gaming entertainment for your dollar? '... the first thing I personally thought about when approaching this was money spent versus time played. Using Final Fantasy Tactics: War of the Lions as an example: I bought the game for about $30 Canadian, and played it for roughly 85 hours. That comes out to 2.83 hours per dollar spent, a pretty good number. In this case, the game was a lot of fun and it was cheap, and so the system works fairly well. There are so many other things to think about, though. What if the game wasn't so good? What about the fact that it's portable? ... What about the new content? Multiplayer?'"
User Journal

Journal Journal: Help

I am wasteful with peppermints. Please God, Help me not to steal the church peppermints.
The Internet

Net Neutrality vs. Technical Reality 251

penciling_in writes "CircleID has a post by Richard Bennett, one of the panelists in the recent Innovation forum on open access and net neutrality — where Google announced their upcoming throttling detector. From the article: 'My name is Richard Bennett and I'm a network engineer. I've built networking products for 30 years and contributed to a dozen networking standards, including Ethernet and Wi-Fi. I was one of the witnesses at the FCC hearing at Harvard, and I wrote one of the dueling Op-Ed's on net neutrality that ran in the Mercury News the day of the Stanford hearing. I'm opposed to net neutrality regulations because they foreclose some engineering options that we're going to need for the Internet to become the one true general-purpose network that links all of us to each other, connects all our devices to all our information, and makes the world a better place. Let me explain ...' This article is great insight for anyone for or against net neutrality."
The Internet

Google To Develop ISP Throttling Detector 198

bigwophh writes "Google has been very vocal on its stance for net neutrality. Now, Richard Whitt — Senior Policy Director for Google — announces that Google will take an even more active role in the debate by arming consumers with the tools to determine first-hand if their broadband connections are being monkeyed with by their ISPs."

Slashdot Top Deals

"It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God but to create him." -Arthur C. Clarke

Working...