"Child porn" is not a real problem. Real "Kiddie Porn" probably exist, probably in darkest corners of internet, but unless you were part of a group that exchanged it you would never find it. "Child porn", which I imagine imagine they are referring to mostly teen nudes of 13-17 which teens make themselves and share on snap chat etc, is about as a dangerous to society as masturbation.
Meanwhile, the average lifespan of the American male has DECREASED for the 3rd year in a row while suicide and deaths from Fentanyl alone are almost 70,000 per year and climbing while the media largely ignores this because if impacts men males more often.
By developing tech to tackle "Child Porn" they are developing sweeping Orwellian tech to censor and monitor all free communications of the people. This is disastrous implications to a free society and democracy in the future. I would much rather take some one uploading underage nudity or sex. Make underage sex illegal, photographic it and uploading it. Photographing it and uploading to the internet just documents the crime. Is seeing the naked human body worth risking democracy the world over? That's what's at stake over "child porn".
I say for 0.00000000000000000001% of the data that might be consider "child porn", is it should be legal, rather than have our rights violated by invasive government/tech monitoring of our information.