Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Fat Change (Score 1) 364

I would like to refer you to the reply about transmission infrastructure I made elsewhere in this thread, because I am not going to type it again. The short version is, there is no budget to replace the current infrastructure, which will assuredly last the duration of my career. I intentionally positioned myself that way to avoid robot replacement. This redesign you speak of may happen, but it's at least two generations of technology away, and broadcast infrastructure iterations are expected to last 40 years / cycle.

Comment Re:Fat Change (Score 1) 364

Transmission systems are the last thing that will be robotized. I base this on the fact that there are still sections of the electrical grid using parts that were installed in the 1940's. Baring a complete re-installation of these systems (which ain't gonna happen) they will be using people to maintain these systems for another fifty years.

^This. Spoken like someone who has perhaps seen one of these sites, unlike the rest of the commenters. The broadcast industry is over a century old, and certain aspects have not changed from the first time they "got it right", such as transmission line. We know how to make it perfect. With that goes the understanding that we expect it (infrastructure) to last a long long time. While we broadcasters use cutting edge technology in the studio where the content is created, the transmission infrastructure that's out there is from the 80's and 90's, and it ain't going anywhere anytime soon. Nor will it have extremely expensive robots attached to it. The people who spent the massive sums of money to install it expect it to work a while longer, because they are strapped for expenditures from all that cutting edge technology and talent being used on the front end.

A decade ago when I got into this field, I did so because I too saw the writing on the wall that robots would replace some jobs. Woe, whole swaths of job categories in some industries. I realized in time that I wanted a job that was safe from that, so I looked for something that absolutely required a human's *hands* and *whole body* and not just his smarts. I can't say for certain that my job is safe a few generations of technology from now, but I can say for certainty it won't change before I retire from my current job. And I'm damn sure not looking for another job. There isn't anything else I can get that won't be phased out or infested with newbies, and because of the extreme specialization, the compensation is as good as any tech job out there.

Comment Re:Fat Change (Score 1) 364

"* Climbs up tower and replaces part: ehhhh...you win.

You have me on that last one. Replacing parts still requires a human. For now"

I could easily see that being replaced by a modular design of easy to fail parts and a drone. Drone flies up, puts part multitool into slot, unslots it and transfer the one from its drone bay in place. Optical sensors verify the repair and no air leaks.

Wrong. The parts are absurdly heavy and have to be winched up. This requires several people keeping tabs on where the part is and steering it so it doesn't smash other antennae on the way up. Furthermore, the tower is swaying back and forth in the wind.

Manually switching parts is difficult only because the parts havent been designed to be switched by a robot. Once that happens, game over. You've probably seen videos of robotic tape libraries already. https://www.google.ca/search?t...

I have a tape library. And a room full of servers. And hundreds of fiber links. And about a thousand spinning disks. There's no automated way to keep all of those things working. And none in sight.

All thats needed is to design and build the system. We have the technology. Making it cheaper than paying some forest ranger 50k a year to do it on the otherhand might take a while.

Wrong again. The more technology you throw at the system, the more important the human in charge of the system becomes. This is what robofetishists keep failing to recognize. It's a bit like the Dunning-Kruger Effect, which you have demonstrated by referring to broadcast engineers as forest rangers. I would remind you that we make quite a bit more than $50K/y, as well. What I make here in Alabama equates to about $160K in San Fransico's economy.

Comment Re:Fat Change (Score 1) 364

I have a limited amount of time to reply, so I can't go into as much detail as I had liked. But I appreciate the insight. Like your industry, we too have automated very much of the broadcast operations.

Originally when this started happening, there was fear the humans would be replaced. What we found out instead was that it simply allowed the same amount of humans to do more. It meant we went from being a single station to being a statewide network with multiple transmission sites. It meant that the operations team spends their days programming the playback automation instead of doing manual playback. In my engineering role, it means that now I have MCU's, digital sensors, and a WAN for taking my readings and doing troubleshooting.

Simply put, automation did not simplify humans roles or obviate them; it made the humans' roles even more important and far more difficult, because the environment is now almost unthinkably intricate and complex. When the automated processes break down, there is no automated "overseer" to get the robots back on track. I don't see an end to that trend any time soon.

Comment Fat Change (Score 4, Insightful) 364

I would definitely put myself in that category that strongly disagrees. There may be robots that can do physical tasks in factories, and software "robots" that automate broadcast playout are a thing.. But the idea that a bipedal robot is going to be able to drive my work truck out to a remote & off-road site and go inside to replace a 9000 volt vacuum or climb up the 1800ft tower to find a loose hanger or air leak is almost as perposterous as the idea that we won't be using high power transmitters anymore. It just ain't gonna happen... And that's exactly why I left the datacenter to find a job like this one which requires hands-on skills.

Comment Re:Tesla (not the car company) (Score 2) 110

Of course what little we know about his work is also part speculation, so I consider Tesla's esoteric & unrealized works a mere curiosity. Meanwhile, the tinfoil hat crowd takes any rumor of Tesla's success as if it were written in stone by divine actor(s) and delivered to Moses on a mountain. It's all somewhat paradoxical; on the one hand he developed real-world, usable tech like alternating current motors and generators, while on the other hand claiming that he knew these things because he could tap into a universal, ethereal body of knowledge that exists in another dimension. You have to take his work seriously while still being aware that the man was possibly quite mad.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The only way for a reporter to look at a politician is down." -- H.L. Mencken

Working...