Then explain why Republicans are carrying water for the Epstein-connected asshats out there.

If it's "almost entirely Democrats" as you claim, why hasn't this DoJ -- with absolutely no inhibitions about going after political prosecutions with plenty of evidence to back that assertion -- gone after the "almost entirely Democrats" involved? How has there been exactly 1 prosecution?

Open your god damn eyes. This REPUBLICAN President, who has his REPUBLICAN lackeys in the DoJ, and his REPUBLICAN puppets in Congress pulling every lever they can to delay, distract, and demolish any attempt to get accountability and justice; while Democrats are unanimous in their want of accountability and justice - even if it means burning down their own (Clinton).

This is a great analysis. And it boils down to one thing: a sufficiently big leap in technology disrupts, and ultimately changes everything. It's not necessarily a good or bad thing - it's just the churn. And you either rise to the top, or sink to the bottom.

And here in easily observed reality, that has basically not been the case going back to the 1960s. I assure you the moment Sputnik launched and was heard beaconing away, someone in the Pentagon was already talking about putting weapons there. So were their Soviet counterparts. And so was / is China when they developed their own access outside the atmosphere.

It's nicer to see a majority of voters who get it. Hopefully that signal becomes evident in ~50 days.

The user was creating and testing the tool.

Guess what, if an arms manufacturer is testing a missile and it goes off course and doesn't respond to an abort code and blows up a school, the arms manufacturer is going to be in a lot of fucking trouble.

Unless the school is filled with little girls in Iran, then nothing will happen at all other than hundreds of dead kids.

I see my own local working around this crap all the time. I'm using RTK to conserve context - I'll see it try to do some huge grep command and get back a summary, so then it goes to writing an inline Python regex to do the same thing.

This should surprise nobody - if it can come up with a way through, it's going to do that unless hitting a hard permissions boundary or some other guard rail.

Also, why is your data backend publicly exposed to begin with? Never heard of a DMZ?

BZZT. "Awwwwwww" says the studio audience.

Patents are about processes, not ideas.

Did they pay for the usage?

Did your AI give them the responses they paid for?

Not really seeing what the problem is here, other than throwing a piss fit over someone using your product successfully.

More accurately:

"Hey, how dare you pay to use our stuff in a way we don't like! We don't care if you paid for every token and we watched you do it the whole time while cashing your checks - it's not fair!"

Fuck these clowns. China paid you for a service, which you provided and were happy to cash their check. Lie in the pig sty you created.

So the guys raping the culture to train their models, are having their own IP raped by China?

Let me shed giant crocodile tears. My heart pumps purple piss for them, really.

Because tax free / interest free loans are cheaper than spending your own money, and always has been?

I see what you're saying, but that's just not the regulatory environment. See: 10 CFR 50.75 which shows that the operator of the plant has been putting aside decommissioning costs into a trust / escrow for the lifetime of the plant license, so that the problem you are speaking of doesn't happen.

The NRC was early on making sure the taxpayers didn't become bagholders for nuclear waste cleanup if an operator goes titsup.

They made a phone that doesn't fit in a pocket unless you wear cargo pants 24/7.

That's not what anyone asked for.

NEMA would like a word. This would be against electric code, and would have been for decades.

You NEVER build a circuit that can overload if someone is using the circuit to it's rating.