Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Nuclear vs coal (Score 1) 141

And coal doesn't get an even bigger indemnity?

Short answer is No, they don't. That said, I agree with everything you said about coal and it is a problem. I'd add that the brine from fracking for gas also contains radioactive particles and is used to damp down dirt roads for dust control. Both are a huge problem.

Coal plants spew fine particles, they spew lead and heavy metals, they have put 100x (likely 1000x) more radio active particles in to the atmosphere than all nuclear plants in the USA ever have.

You're 100% right about that. These are naturally occurring isotopes which are supposed to be in the ground where nature put them. I agree that the coal industry should also receive the same scrutiny that the Nuclear industry does for controlling these materials.

Comment Re:Common Sense vs. California (Score 1) 141

p>California is the third largest state in the nation. 160,000 square miles and local leaders still chose to store nuclear waste within the hazard risk of a tsunami in a border state known for participating in annual El Slammo weather seasons.

As I recall, it is also stored at 4 to 5 times the density of the waste stored at Fukushima.

Comment Re:The hidden subsidies to the nuclear industry (Score 3, Informative) 141

Chernobyl type event; the private owners of such a station would not be expected to pay the full cost of such an event.

The Price Anderson Act (and its amendments) also excludes rate payers from making claims to recover the replacement cost of their homes. Without this Act the nuclear industry would collapse simply because it cannot sustain itself without the insurance indemnities it provides.

Comment Re:1960s 'woke' was not 2020s 'woke' (Score 1) 206

Star Trek is no hard sci-fi.

For sure. BTW - I've never seen someone type with a Scottish accent.

It's 2026, surely gay people on TV doing normal family stuff isn't controversial now?

Not at all, more that when sexuality is used as an instrument in hard sci fi, for example in Greg Bear's "Anvil of Stars" it's used in such a way that makes Discovery look tame. Otherwise it's simply irrelevant.

Comment Re:Ironically I was quite a trekkie until this yea (Score 2) 206

Buddy...when the original Star Trek ran that allowed Babylon 5 to be what it was (which was excellent, by the way).

I'll see your TOS and B5 and raise you Blake's 7 - which also created the long story arc to tackle ideas like a powerfully dystopian society.

Which ironically fit's into Star Trek Cannon so perfectly it should be a part of star trek, or star trek should be part of Blake's 7.

Comment Re:1960s 'woke' was not 2020s 'woke' (Score 1) 206

The modern shows The only reason people think they are too woke is because their own ideas are in line with TOS and TNG, but Trek and much of society in general has now moved past them.

Most people don't read hard sci fi where sexuality is an also ran to much bigger ideas. Discovery made it about sexuality in an in your face way which kind of obliterated some of the really good sci-fi that was in it. SNW seems to have left that behind which is in line with what you're saying probably because it's boring and slightly annoying.

Comment Re: 1960s 'woke' was not 2020s 'woke' (Score 3, Funny) 206

Being woke

Being trapped in a binary star system while telepathic beings project their requests for hydrogen so they too can escape isn't woke. It's interference with the brainwave modes required for sleep.

Being awake all the time is bad sometimes you need to be asleep so you don't go mad.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Right now I feel that I've got my feet on the ground as far as my head is concerned." -- Baseball pitcher Bo Belinsky

Working...