Comment Re:I don't understand how this is 'orchestrating' (Score 3, Interesting) 160
Comment Re:Look at the State of Baden-Württemberg! (Score 1) 1122
Comment Re:Nuclear technologies (Score 4, Insightful) 1122
Comment Re:The *real* shame in all of this (Score 2) 1122
Comment Re:Turning back the clock... (Score 1) 205
Comment Too much thermal compound (Score 1) 501
Comment Re:maybe we need a better way of making electricit (Score 1) 349
Comment Re:Heroism (Score 1) 349
Comment Re:Life with MySQL can be frustrating (Score 1) 146
Comment Re:It's easy to comply with the GPL (Score 1) 566
Comment Re:Incorrect. (Score 1) 566
The GPL doesn't propagate as long as you don't distribute the program. It doesn't have anything to do with using it like proprietary software. If somebody can download your program, you have to honor the GPL.
Comment Re:someone, please explain this to me (Score 1) 566
It isn't the source code redistribution or availability that is the problem with GPL on an app store.
From GPLv2:
You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, under Section 2) in object code or executable form...
The app stores do not allow you to copy and distribute the Program in executable form, since they are wrapped up in DRM layers and I would bet there are also license verbiage that says you are not allowed to copy the apps downloaded from the app store. It is very easy to provide the distribution of source code for an app on the app store, you just point to a file on the internet, a phone number to call or an address to write to asking for the source.