Comment Re:Socialism for oil companies, not so much for us (Score 1) 132
not having environmental laws being as strict as you want is not a subsidy
Tried learning JavaScript. Failed at that. I am the Charlie Brown of languages.
Get out of here with your parroting of "iphone benuzeual 100 bajillion" nonsense. Everyone's heard it before, and your delivery makes you even worse at it than the near-entirety of the other disingenuous prats here. Come back from your at-will-fireable job, from your rented bedroom, when you have something approaching an original thought on capitalism. Til then, go back to paying your landlord with the money you made while making someone else even richer.
Idealist? Realist? This man has never been anything other than an opportunist... one attuned to exploit others' idealism, particularly slashdot-libertarian crypto bro types who believe technology+greed can solve all of society's ills. All the while, this plastic faced MFer has built a fortune whose cornerstone was grifting taxpayer dollars
So, your only stated ethic is profit motive. He's seemingly only unethical because he is bad at extracting the excess value from leveraged resources and labor? Wealth extraction on behalf of the ownership class, with disregard to lives and livelihood of everyday folks, is literally the only virtue you've promoted. You're not helping the case that capitalism isn't the core problem.
The exception to the rule proves the rule
So you're seriously saying OpenAI / Altman is a counterexample that actually proves that capitalism is ethical, by default, as a rule, and that this specific situation somehow magically isn't just capitalist-minded people capitalizing?
No spitting on the Bus! Thank you, The Mgt.