Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Good or bad? (Score 1) 132

Now I agree "mass surveillance" is creepy, but we can have Flock without mass surveillance.

Mass surveillance is the widespread collection and monitoring of data on large groups of people, usually without specific proof of wrongdoing. This is exactly mass surveillance.

You are arguing that there a benefits to mass surveillance and we should accept them to feel secure in our lives. I disagree with your opinion and think you are naive for thinking mass surveillance won't ever be abused.

Comment Re:EFF Rayhunter (Score 3, Interesting) 172

Besides the abuse of power, and the Constitutional violations via unreasonable search and seizure, this monitoring causes a chilling effect amongst those with dissenting opinions. The protest may go unimpeded but your opinion has you targeted and monitored by the government for not agreeing.

Which part of this is lost on you?

Comment Re:People want biased news. (Score 1) 83

The majority of media companies are seeking profit. Profit for media companies has been driven by algorithms that promote outrage via clickbait vs substance. What you are suggesting is that the media companies are owned by politicians who control the message and how it is presented. I do not believe that is how it works. Sure a politician will gladly accept the distraction and may provide some misinformation (the CIA has done this for decades) but they aren't the media. Media companies decide what to publish and how they monetize, not the politicians. This is the same for all parties.

Comment Re:Yes, please! (Score 1) 50

They (Thiel and Musk) haven't had any involvement in PayPal for 24 years. Currently there are parties to assign blame and concerns to that make sense. Besides being owned by Ebay then spun off there has been eight presidents of the company. What in your opinion do Thiel and Musk do at PayPal for the last 24 years?

Comment Re:Stupid executives make stupid decisions (Score 2) 49

You do exactly this. The c suite (the ones making these decisions) are incentivized by triggering the stocks to move. They get that motion by any action that can move the stock price during their tenure. Will it leave a husk that is ready to implode in 4-5 years time? It doesn't matter... they did their job and it triggered their stock incentive payout and golden parachute. They are already gone and moved on to the next company where they can claim that under their reign the stock jumped 20% at company X. This is why after a long enough time as a publicly traded company they all become shit, lose what made them great and sows the seeds of their own devolution.

Comment AI Token Burn rate will surprise them (Score 2, Interesting) 55

The alarming rate at which 505k employees burn through the annual token allotment with little to nothing to show for it except some super wasteful reports that are likely cheaper to produce in meat space will be the topic of a future article posted here in Early 2027.

Slashdot Top Deals

All the simple programs have been written.

Working...