Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: It's the Wild West (Score 1) 94

I use Claude Fable every way, the safety guardrails constantly trigger on things that are certainly not hacking.

Anything where I ask it to debug networking by inspecting raw packets, work with kernel modules, or even third-party library wrappers (which contain some amount of reverse-engineering to identify and workaround issues) tend to trip it up.

It's just harmful at this point. Meanwhile it will grant itself root and masquerade as other users to inspect what they're up to without even asking me about it.

Comment Correct one obvious (Score 2) 50

The correct choice is obvious, this sort of thing was already experienced in the Linux kernel and elsewhere.

Patches are submitted by humans. It doesn't matter what tools you used to build the patch, so long as you stand behind it as a human and are responsible for it, meaning you did review it and make sure it is meaningful and worthwhile.

The main concern with AI use is that it will continuously write code and pull requests with no effort; it moves the effort from writing the code to reviewing it. If you don't actually review and just push that responsibility to others, you're not doing anything of value and just causing more work for others.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Who alone has reason to *lie himself out* of actuality? He who *suffers* from it." -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Working...