CS went to shit when it went retail.

The amount that's been stolen, by continually extending copyright term lengths and impeding works' entrance to the public domain, has absolutely dwarfed all copyright infringement committed and counterfeit goods produced in the same time frame.

Surely there will be a scene depicting the tea-bagging of a dead enemy, lest it be wholly inaccurate.

All captive markets should crumble. They do nothing beneficial to the consumer.

This.

Too much Pedro Pascal has ruined him, just like Oscar Isaac years ago. Fine actors with too much market saturation.
RDJ shouldn't have been cast either. Both roles should have gone to an up-n-comer à la Chris Hemsworth (or the rest of majority of the cast).

A modern phone is nothing more than a hand-held computer, so why isn't this applied equally to Macs? It can't be that much of a concern for bad actors.
We also know the big software players(Adobe, for example) would never give Apple 30%. The app store a bullshit captive market solely to benefit Apple.

Why can't the media files be from the 100s of movies and CDs I own?

It can mean that, in the same way as "Get rid of" can mean to kill.

Both can also mean to remove. Context should surely come into play.

Why stop at the endorser?
Surely, everyone involved in the entire ad campaign is equally liable.

Obviously, it is dependent on the location in which you are speaking.
If you are speaking English in France, it should be done in a French accent.
When I visited New York, my midwestern accent changes quite naturally at this point.
Do they not teach this school anymore?

What I want from AI regarding movies, is the ability to prompt stuff like "play me this movies but with these actors" or "this movie but in that time period" or "ever character but that one is a puppet" and have it play it me, for my own personal entertainment, with zero external costs, save the AI system.

Like when he said the 5070 would deliver "4090 performance at $549". It doesn't.

Exactly.

There are many cases where fair use and profit can and do mingle. Every work of parody made commercially available would be a good start. Any sort of critique or commentary, whether it be reviews or a track-by-track breakdown of album x, falls squarely under fair use. It doesn't matter if it's a college dissertation, a random youtuber, or a commercially driven media conglomerate doing it.