I don't mind having a shitty president all that much. That someone like Trump would become president, isn't a complete disaster. Every president has probably disappointed every citizen, in at least some way. And as someone whose political platform since 1992 has been little more than "civil rights uber alles," bitter defeat has been the familiar status quo.
But I hate that Trump, the specific individual, won't ever serve the criminal sentences he's earned (especially in the stolen-documents case). His supporters call the criminal cases "lawfare" but ALL of us are subject to that same thing continuously, and if we did the same things he did, we'd go to prison.
So why aren't the people who call enforcement of our laws "lawfare," condemning the law itself? They should be screaming "let's repeal the Espionage Act!" or trying to legalize all forms of fraud, legalize asking a state to provide incorrect vote counts, or pass an amendment to strike the emoluments clause from the constitution. If you think these laws are unfair, then try to do something about it, even if all you can do is advocate. Bitching on the internet is all I'm asking you to do! Take a stand, even if you otherwise don't really do anything.
But they don't. They want these laws to remain, but their guy should be a lone exception to enforcement. Well, then, fuck you!
I had the same gripe about Bill Clinton's perjury. I didn't really care about the perjury and I thought the question he gave a lie to, was irrelevant to what was being investigated, but there was a catch: I knew if I had done same the same thing, I'd be punished. The person who signed the fucking DMCA expects me to obey it, even though I think the law has no merit? Then I expect that same person to comply with the prohibition on perjury, even though they think the question they're asked under oath, has no merit.
(At least Bush and Obama's use of deadly force against suspected terrorists, was a gray area which could conceivably be part of their legitimate duties as commander of the military. Had they ever faced criminal trials, I honestly don't know what a good-faith jury would decide. But the cases against Bill Clinton and Donald Trump would be easy, non-nuanced slam dunks!)
With Trump's rather obvious (no gray areas here) and easy-to-prove violations, I was hoping to see one of these people finally die by the same sword they heartlessly wield against the public. I want politicians to be terrified of getting caught disobeying the rules they swear to inflict upon everyone.
But once again, that's not going to happen, so I'm pissed off.
Maybe I'm just jealous that they get to be criminals without risk.