Comment really? really? creationist view since Feb '11 (Score 1) 267
I've been reading the biblical creationist perspective on this since Feb 2011: Rapid tomcod ‘evolution by pollution’? Yeah, right and wrong.
This is not the kind of "evolution" needed to evolve lower-order organisms into higher-order ones. In fact, a better description for this particular case is "develution"
If you look close enough at any of these examples of evolution we keep hearing about, they're never the kind that molecules-to-man evolution requires.
Try again