671671

That was one morning for me. Within 8 hours 600k+ unique IPs requesting a single page, all with quite old browser user agents. A sample of them all returned them as domestic ISP IPs from various regions in the world. So they were probably doorbells, TV, nanny cams, fridges, and other compromised IoT devices.
The problem from China got so large that I simply added a netset file for China to my firewall. I figured I'd help their great firewall as my site doesn't really get legitimate users from China.

They will only be allowed to "accidentally" hack US companies that do not pay Trump protection money.

If it was taken down after 2.5 hours it means nobody saw the movie, just part of it.

I am not convinced you get speed. I think you are more borrowing from the future. The speed you might get now, is what you have to pay back in the future.

They've turned gameplay into a casino, where you grind away for six hours hoping for that rare-item drop.

And that is the future Microsoft is looking at.

BitKeeper also did everything Git could back in the day.

I thought these Al were really intelligent and powerful, why do I need special skills for them? Can't I just tell them what to do?

Those javax -> jakarta packages were not part of the JRE. However, those common interfaces are extremely popular. So you probably use a framework or library which uses them and has transitioned to the newer packages. But you could still use the old frameworks or libraries in a newer JRE, assuming they do not use a library that messes with JVM bytecode (which is commonly used to create more advanced class proxies). Javaassist, OW2 ASM, and the likes are the problematic parts for moving on to a newer JRE. These libraries are used a lot. In most cases you cannot simply drop in a new bytecode manipulating library. That's where you run into the part where you have to move your software to newer frameworks and libraries which then also mean you need to change some of your code to go to the jakarta packages. And then you need to hope your software didn't abused some undocumented behavior/features, or internals, of those frameworks.

Yes, there is a high probability that your (enterprise) software will need code changes in order to run on newer JREs.

Nine years ago we already had a funny prompt injection: https://www.bbc.com/news/techn...
Which was then used commercial by Burger King: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Can't wait for the new ad prompt injections.

If it's still ongoing or cancelled should be a warning to everybody of the risk of being tied to Microsoft.

Oh no... they are in danger.

A human who has seen the source code cannot be part of the team producing a clean room implementation. They will taint the project with their general knowledge of the system they try to rebuild.

20 years ago BonziBuddy could do the same, and people were losing their mind if they encountered it on a system

Could always run for president of the USA

And who had to dig through those false positives to find the actual issues.

Further more, the article doesn't mention the security issues, nor the software it was found in. Just the number 500.