How far is the foreseeable future? I'm thinking not as far as people would like to think. So the answer is "perhaps".
1) Yes economics has something to do with it.. but extrapolating concord economics to a hypersonic might be stretch.. the train is cheaper than air travel.. but you don't see near as much train travel as air travel on longer routes. It depends on the economics of the system. No you won't see a hypersonic concord, but a concord can't go hypersonic anyway. When the cost per hour (time saved) exceeds cost difference of travel.. you will see a niche. That depends on the technology and the relative cost for the energy difference. If for example you have miracle fuel where energy is cheap and the mechanicals aren't too expensive, you will see it.
Or if it fills a unique niche (time delivery or areas not easily serviced by subsonic airplanes) would also push it to execution.
2) Security.. I can imagine a number of security counter arguments.. example there is no pilot so no human error, Or the defense forces have a destruct button, or that antiballistic missile technology actually works.. for one incoming craft with a transponder. I think there are ways around the security arguments. Also the sensing arguments similar.. (infrared trackers, satellite radar, transponders, etc).
3) No, hypersonic tech isn't here, so it is rather hard to say what it would look like.. what the ground time would be for air time. But I expect if they are constructing it.. and it is economic, that the concord gives the high side of maintenance time, I would expect automatic testing, adaptive structures, advanced materials and of course engine/propulsion (and or heat/aerodynamics) would be needed to push the turn around time down. Imagine no pilot, and the craft is controlled from the ground it being so smart you mostly say go from space port A to space port B, After it lands it cycles itself through a plane service/refinish line and is ready for flight very shortly.. it might be worth while, does that make it economic.. depends on all those little details on how it does it. How well do you foresee the future?
hmm.. I would agree with a number of people. memory is generally lossy.
However the other point would be from the argument I get the implied that:
Consciousness requires lossy memory.. lossy memory is certainly easy to generate.
Though it might not be deterministic (depends on how you loose memory).
FORTUNE'S FUN FACTS TO KNOW AND TELL: A guinea pig is not from Guinea but a rodent from South America.