So why do they bother cloning in the first place?

In case you delete/hide your repo? Or they may want to make changes later, but not upstream them?

Why not?

Have a closer look at the last column on that table.

That means it's catching cases where the doctor already thinks there's an issue

Compare with the Machine Learning exercise back in '17 I think that was attempting to identify cancers from photos, only to have their "AI" learn that photos with rulers in them were more likely to have cancers identified later (because they only used a ruler for lesions that were concerning to begin with before taking the photo.):

• https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-doctors-arent-afraid-of-better-more-efficient-ai-diagnosing-cancer

possession and selling the personal data of 279 million Indonesians

Google seems to think the population of Indonesia is only 270M...

https://www.inverse.com/scienc...

In a new study, scientists find another reason why air pollution is bad for the brain — this time zeroing in on the effect it has on men’s brain health. The study examines the negative effect of fine particulate matter, also known as PM 2.5 pollution. You might know it as black carbon or “soot.”

The real question is how much pollution this release will cause.

As far as radiation is concerned, about half the worldwide daily consumption of bananas. Or a coal-fired power plant run for 6 hours:

https://www.expunct.com/enviro...

The Verge's article breaks down all the various ways you can access the content you purchased through the Play Store

Licenced, surely?

A four-day week in the public sector would create up to half a million new jobs...

So, the private sector cannot do this, but the public sector (paid from taxes raised from the private sector) could.

What we in the UK need and want are less public sector tax-sponging employees, and more private sector tax-producing employees.

potential value of $62.5bn

That's the amount said waste is likely to be worth after it's been collected, transported to processing, actually being processed, along with other steps along the way.

The problem, that the people demanding this happen ignore, is the cost of that collecting, transporting and processing, which is likely to be well in excess of that final $62.5bn.

Which is why people must be forced into doing this collecting, transporting and processing. If it were profitable, people wouldn't need any encouragement.

Which shows that far from saving resources, the whole process is actually going to consume more resources - the complete opposite of what the people proposing this happens seem to indicate that they want.

IBM is apologizing and seeking forgiveness

Now they just have to sort out not sacking the old (sorry - expensive) people...

FTA:

25 unique dice (letters) assigned to 25 positions: 25!
6 possible faces (digits) exposed by each die) x 6^25
4 possible orientations of each exposed face 4^25
4 possible orientations of box reduced to one* / 4^1

=124,127,134,662,179,891,202,329,100,571,859,806,502,566,406,865,813,504,000,000 =2^196 +
        (> 196 bits)

*To generate secrets consistently even if you scan your DiceKey sideways or rotated up-side down, our software rotates your DiceKey to a canonical orientation before deriving secrets from it.

I couldn't, easily, find out how they canonicalise the orientation however, so that might actually reduce it by more than that last 4^1.

Is this another organisation being deliberately blind to the fact that IA honour robots.txt (even to the point where they'll delete archives from when there wasn't an applicable robots.txt, but is now.) And has done for quite a while

.. wonderful how accurate it can be...

Especially with the foresight to try to claim you had sufficient amounts of foresight beforehand, after the fact.

so long as you have something between your mouth and nose

Does a moustache count? Part of a goatee?

Plot twist; it's an inverse Turing Test - there's a live person on the other end pretending to be an AI chatbot...