Well how else do you expect AMD to get some positive press for this thing?
Well how else do you expect AMD to get some positive press for this thing?
>As a display technology engineer, I find it plausible that a hacker could use the overlay to display a simple image in place of the usual content or flash a 1x1 pixel region at full frame rate.
Well I'm not a display engineer like your or the parent, but yes, it's pretty obvious that if you modify the firmware responsible for the OSD, you could overlay goatse or something. That's annoying, but not really a huge issue, and as the other pointed out, at that point you'd be already fucked anyway.
But can he make SS United States great again?
Even though Boeing wasn't found liable, they still had to deal with the lawsuits. They have an army of lawyers for that, I'm sure, but this isn't something a smaller drone manufacturer wants to deal with. Plus, you never know how the lawsuits might end up. Someone could argue that the manufacturer (like Boeing in your story) should've spent $5 to offer to implement geofencing and save are children.
Then there's always the hordes of people completely outraged whenever a drone flies somewhere where they think they shouldn't, like in line of sight of an airplane or a park or their house. The less attention these incidents incur, the better - they already have to deal with retarded registration rules and what not, and they don't want to create a demand for more rules that would put people off the hobby.
Of course, I'm happy to fly a manual controlled quad that does whatever I tell it to do, and as long as this option is available, I don't mind the mainstream products being a bit crippled to keep idiots out of trouble.
A lot of troll posts here, wonder if they are by the same person? Possibly as they show a basic grasp of fundamentals.
That's not a Ponzi scheme. A Ponzi scheme promises great immediate returns, and uses investors money to pay off other investors to fool people into thinking they are. Nobody is buying into Tesla to make a quick buck. I doubt people invested large sums because they expected every car to be electric by 2020.
They are sold at a loss because it takes continued R&D to bring the costs down. To short sighted people like yourself, R&D is a considered a waste of money. However refining the world's most advanced car manufacturing plant, developing and integrating the software and battery technologies, all takes time and money. In the mean time building up a significant patent portfolio. See the sale of the patent portfolios of Motorola or Nokia to see how much this can be worth.
Starting from scratch is expensive. We all hope they can make it. Mobile phones were sold at a loss for a long time after they came out, but I wouldn't like to be without mine now.
Why don't you reboot the system and see? =)
I have to say that as much as it sucks for those affected (which is not that much, since it's just the MBR), this virus is like a breath of fresh retro-air. Check out the message
Ahh, it's like being in 1998 again and getting your drive wiped by CIH. Those were the days.
The initial Win7->10 upgrade actually left my Grub and Linux stuff alone. I wasn't too worried as it was basically a toy installation but it was still nice to see.
What I've heard about the AU is that it just unchecks "Time to display list of operating systems" in startup options but otherwise everything is in place.
Anyway I'm in no rush to get the update so I killed the update service and will just wait until the dust settles.
I'm happy to hear that yet another piece of "alternative", "stick-it-to-The-Man" payment infrastructure has been burgled. Really.
Then you are rather a sick individual.
You see, a large part of the appeal of bitcoin comes from its aura of "under the radar", "the authorities need never find out" financial transactions.
No it isn't. A large part of the appeal of mobile phones to terrorists is ease of communication, however most people are not terrorists. I think a lot of people are interested because you can transfer money anywhere in the world instantly with no transaction charge. No VISA, Western Union, Paypal, etc. You can access your money for free too. I pay through the nose in bank charges for access to my own money. In France, you even pay a monthly charge to own a credit card!
For the first group (criminals) I believe it serves as a useful deterrent, or at least a risk and a complication.
Er no, I don't think criminals keep their money on Bitcoin exchanges.
So to summarise, we should wait outside your house and then kick the crap out of you and take all your belongings so you get a personal reminder that there are not so nice people out there? Enjoy living in YOUR world. And no don't bother talking about the police as your "safeguard", you know there is a 99.99% chance they won't do anything.
If the bank gets robbed, the insurance replaces your money. You pay for this in bank fees. Nothing to stop somebody starting a Bitcoin insurance, so your money will be as safe as in a bank. That way you get the security without all the extortionate transfer fees.
Not just the Greeks but people lost their money in Iceland and Cyprus. People get their accounts hacked, card cloned, etc, all the time. Credit card fraud is way more than Bitcoin, and that cost just gets passed onto the bank customer (ie you).
It's amazing that people like JustAnotherOldGuy think banks are still safe. In the UK, anybody that has any sense spreads their money amongst multiple banks keeping under £75,000 (the amount guaranteed by the government) in each one.
For under $1000 I wouldn't even keep a backup more effort than a USB stick.
Actually when banks get robbed you can lose your money. It happens all the time. Sometimes you get a portion back, in the UK the government guarantees up to £75,000, or in the case where the Spanish banks where supposed to be holding your money for property investment you get none back. Try looking up what happened to those with their money in the Cyprus and Icelandic banks.
Have you been to Germany? I've driven through a number of times and have been surprised to see how similar it is to driving through England (except with nicer cars). Especially the suburbs where the houses and the shops look so familiar. They also love their pubs, with similar pub grub (but with no horse in their sausages). I was in Berlin yesterday and it's certainly not the prettiest of German cities but it's definitely not the ugliest in the west. If you drive through the large Turkish areas then you will get a bad impression. Then again if a tourist drove down Tooting Broadway they wouldn't think England the most elegant place in the world.
If you think of Rome as a beautiful place to visit then maybe you should try? It's dirty, covered in graffiti, crime-ridden, people trying to force knocked-off goods on you every street corner. The banking system in Italy is on the verge of collapse too. Paris is nice but try going to Marseilles. See how long you can live there before you get your first beating.
Merkel's immigration policy may have upset a lot of people and caused chaos across Europe, but that's not Germany as a people or a place.
given the level of misinformation being peddled by the anti-EU media
Are you kidding? Did you not see the level of misinformation peddled by the Remain camp? They rolled out everyone from celebrities to the IMF, and even the American President Mr Obama, to say what a disaster it would be telling some real whoppers.. Some in the Leave camp may have published ropey information but there is NO WAY you can say it wasn't both sides peddling misinformation.
The referendum was not unnecessary, it was an election pledge made by Mr Cameron and the public voted him into office with that being one of the promises he made. Mr Cameron has always been a man of integrity, and despite the great political risk he kept his promise. Ok it destroyed him. But he did what he thought was the right thing.
Can you give an actual, real-world example for the EU appointing some country's government?
The EU government, in Brussels, where their government over-rules the national one.
Yeah... except that the petition for a do-over was opened by a pro-Leave voter and opened BEFORE the referendum.
But why should facts matter, right?
You talk about facts, then bring up a great statistical sample of... ONE PERSON???
Um... you're assuming that everyone was fully informed and aware of all the consequences while voting.
This is never the case. Not even in a general election. It is the best argument for abolishing democracy. But as Churchill once said, "Everything else we've tried is worse".
But we heard enough voices of people who voted leave and then started to realize what benefits they're getting from the EU that they might lose.
And also those that were told it would be gloom and disaster if they leave the EU, and are now all saying it is nowhere as bad as they thought it was going to be.